I have no doubt that the Pharaohs (who had the elongated skull) were the Nephilim of the Bible. Their size in the many reliefs is hard to miss compared to that of people. I also have no doubt that they are the ones who constructed all the HUGE sized statues, temples and pyramids. It does not surprise me, but only confirms my belief that they were extremely technological species before their time.
Unfortunately this post claims there to be a march 15th press release, but that does not exist anywhere on the internet, only the study from 2022 showing readings above ground inside the pyramid. This story is fake and misleading, please try to find more evidence before hasty belief.
I've also been unable to find any links to the supposed March 15th press release. I just find the same statement repeated across various third party accounts of this press release, but no link to the actual release. Seems very suspiciously like this whole notion of a March 15th report (and all that's claimed to be in it) is inaccurate, perhaps totally fictional, information.
"Note: this abstract is released exclusively for journalists interested in attending the press conference on March 16, 2025, where these discoveries will be extensively discussed and presented with supporting evidence."
I used Grok to do some deep diving, it took a bit, but found that, indeed, a conference did occur involving Corrado Malanga, Filippo Biondi, and Armando Mei on March 15, 2025, in Bologna, Italy, at the Hotel Castello Artemide Congressi, titled "Giza, Le Piramidi e la Porta del Tempo." This event, organized by Archeoares, matches the description of the press conference mentioned in the image, where the researchers discussed their SAR findings beneath the Khafre Pyramid. Hope this helps
I had come across that video and from my perspective, it adds no further credibility to the claims. If anything, I find it only detracts from the possibility that this story is factual.
Yeah… a “news” source from Pakistan and “press releases” via Facebook and YouTube are not exactly compelling. The link to a Nature article was promising, but it is not about the same topic… so… yeah, calling this one Bullshit.
Mark Rockeymoore and many other similar accounts are just promoting series of 'self-claimed documentaries' that all leads to a Bible sale via same Amazon Store, nice PR.
Thank you Heather. That was the only reputable and time/date relevant reference/source I've seen on this matter. Although, as far as I can tell, it has no images or findings along the lines of what the social media hype (and @gregreese etc.) has shared on this story.
I am very intrigued that you appear to have set up a SubStack account solely for posting this comment, and for dismissing this story as a "diversion"? I'd love to hear more about what you feel is the "really important" information this story is diverting people from?
“Trevor grassi” YouTube page has the info, he is the one who broke the story (unintentionally lol) Currently waiting for their super long presentation and paper for proofs. I wasn’t aware SAR could go that deep but it is dry sand and bed rock so that helps. There is a lot of circumstantial evidence to support this claim and the disappointing behavior of the Egypt government lends credibility to the statement.
Edit: yes I made an account just to post this one comment cause of all the hate in comments lol. Btw when searching this subject you need to use DuckDuckGo browser as the page would not show up in YouTube, same issue with “Richard Gabriel” YT page, never seen that happen before.
"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the NY Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings, and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop OUR PLAN for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a World Government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual ELITE and World Bankers is surely preferable to the national auto - determination practiced in past centuries." - David Rockefeller CFR Kingpin, Founder of the Trilateral Commission, NWO Godfather / June 1991
The one world government has always existed. The UN/IMF is the One World Government.
In 1302 Pope Boniface XIII stated he was the Godhead of Earth and to this day the Vatican still controls everything. They are the owners of all countries and they believe they own your Soul.
"J F .K. Secret Society Speech" 4.21. 61 ... "For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed."
"The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists." -- J. Edgar Hoover, FBI Director (America is faced with SEVERAL monstrous conspiracies and they are NOT "theories.")
"We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the world - no longer a Government of free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men."- Woodrow Wilson
We are programmed to reject truth, just as William Casey, CIA Director desired when he made the statement, "We will know our project is a success when everything the American People believe is false" The CIA has staff operatives in every major "NEWS" outlet. It's an Intelligence game going on for the uber Elite since "Project Paperclip" in 1947.
I think when a scientist wants to claim a finding is true and backed by evidence they need to publish their experiments and have it confirmed and peer-reviewed by other researchers. This could very well be real, but the lack of publishing their methodology speaks for itself for the time being. To be so contrarian to reject "NEWS" outlets, but believe youtubers. "When everything the american people believe is false." I think it worked on you bud.
The issue is not quantity, the issue is that these all tend to be self referencing nonsense, with no credible or verifiable merit…there is nothing ‘deep’ about any of it.
Hi! I hope you're having a great day and I don't mean to sound condescending, but I do want you to consider that deep research doesn't really solidify the truth of the Bible unless you're only researching facts that support your narrative. Actually the bibles creation came from the need to exert power over a community of people, much like many other religions do. I will admit that it's curious that the story of Jesus so closely aligns with the story of Siddhartha Gautama (the Buddha) and they both emerged around the same time period in two totally separate parts of the world in a time where technology wasn't advanced enough to communicate globally. While this information does not work to discredit or prove anything, it's a simple "now you know". It's interesting the parallels in origin stories, especially considering they took two different paths after. There are so many similarities across all religions that its silly to say someone should research more when they themselves have only researched their own. Just something to consider and maybe look into if you're feeling open-minded. Have a great Thursday!
Sorry to tell you Kelsey, but what you just wrote would have every Jew laughing or swearing at you. The Old Testament is called the Hebrew Scriptures, because it is their history, both spiritually and civically. The OT alone takes up a bit more than 1/2 the Bible. The NT was written by eyewitness of Jesus - the apostles, except one Luke who was not Jewish and Paul, who wasn't an eye witness. What do you suppose caused these men to spread the gospel with such determination after having seen Jesus crucified to bits? It was his resurrection. Once they saw that, they needed to see nothing more. Since that early beginning, Christianity has changed the globe. No other religion can make a claim like this. Buddha never claimed to be God. Jesus did. Buddah never suffered a horrible death to save his followers. Jesus did. Buddha was not recorded as healing the blind, raising the dead, feeding 5K people, etc. Jesus was. There is no comparison. The flood story is found in many cultures, because it happened. It was a global event that will never be forgotten. Only a small group of people at the time knew that It came from Yahweh. The others had no knowledge outside of 'animal gods', etc., so they have different names for the one who sent it, but the fact that it is found every where is undeniable evidence that it happened. I hope you do a lot more research. Your's is woefully lacking. See "Evidence that Demands a Verdict" for actual evidence as to the truth of the Bible. I think the man who wrote it was a lawyer and put this together like a case.
Nikola Tesla, the acknowledged Smartest Man In The World, said that after a lifetime of spiritual study of all the religions, spiritual teachings, theosophies, and philosophies, the one that facilitates the greatest connection to God, is Buddhism.
Archaeology didn’t need the Bible to find these sites.
Nineveh was identified in the mid-1800s by archaeologists like Austen Henry Layard, using Assyrian records, cuneiform tablets, and local tradition — not the Bible.
Babylon was known long before biblical archaeology even began. The site was never “lost” — it was a well-known ruin near modern Hillah, Iraq. Excavations began in earnest under Robert Koldewey in the late 1800s.
Edom (in southern Jordan) was located and studied using geography, ancient trade routes, and inscriptions — again, the Bible was not the key source.
Yes, the Bible mentions real places, but so do Homer’s epics and Gilgamesh. That doesn’t make every story they tell historically accurate. The Bible is a blend of myth, legend, theology, and history — like many ancient texts. Using it to corroborate the existence of cities is fine, but using it to prove supernatural claims (e.g. miracles, global floods, talking snakes) is not archaeology — it’s apologetics.
Many archaeologists study the ancient Near East in the context of the Bible — but they do so critically, not as believers trying to “prove the Bible.”
In fact, archaeology has dis-proven or cast doubt on many biblical claims:
No evidence for a global flood
No evidence for the Exodus as described
No archaeological support for the conquest of Canaan as told in Joshua
Just because the Bible mentions real places doesn’t make its spiritual claims or miraculous stories historically valid. We didn’t need divine inspiration to locate Nineveh — we needed science, linguistics, and a lot of digging.
According to the archeologist, they did. That does not make the Bible "true", but it's not hard fetched to claim at least some of its geography is useful for historical purposes.
On the Conquest of Canaan, it depends if you consider the Habiru as hebrews or not. My theory is that they are one tribe or people who later merged with Hebrews, so not really like in the bible but it has some historicity.
A lot of the “evidence” relies on assuming the Bible is already true to prove that the Bible is true.
Example: “Jesus must have risen because the Bible says so, and we know the Bible is reliable because it says so.”
The book selectively quotes ancient historians (like Josephus or Tacitus) as “proof” of Jesus’ life and resurrection.
These sources mention Jesus, but do not confirm supernatural claims.
Scholars (including Christian ones) acknowledge that miracles aren’t something history can verify.
The book often presents straw man arguments against atheism, Islam, or secularism.
It doesn’t engage with academic counterarguments in good faith — it’s preaching to the choir, not convincing skeptics.
While influential in evangelical circles, many of its arguments have been refuted or weakened by modern biblical scholarship, archaeology, and philosophy.
It ignores or downplays contradictions in the Bible, the evolution of Christian doctrine, and evidence of myth-making in early Christianity.
Bart Ehrman (agnostic NT scholar): Points out that the Gospels were written decades after Jesus’ death, and are not eyewitness reports.
Richard Carrier (historian): Argues that many apologetic claims are based on flawed historical methodology.
Even some Christian scholars have said McDowell oversells the certainty of his conclusions.
This book might affirm beliefs for Christians, but it’s nowhere near convincing for skeptics, historians, or scholars who apply rigorous standards of evidence.
So yeah — if you “actually care,” you’ll probably want to read real academic work on the subject, not just a 1970s evangelical handbook dressed up as courtroom drama.
Hi William, There is so much information out there supporting the truth of the Bible and of Jesus, that I find it hard to believe a real researcher could not find and read this material. In fact, the person who influenced me about Jesus was an atheist who set out to prove that Jesus was not true, and couldn't do it and became a Christian, instead. I could spend time sending you to articles, etc., but my experience with people who say the same things as you have is that intuitively, they know Jesus is God and they don't want to submit to him and bow their knee to him as King. They don't want anyone to be 'God over them" and so they fight what they really know is (probably) true. There is a lot of academic work by unbelievers - agnostics (which you cited), etc. The Apostles were eyewitnesses and there are 4 accounts - 1 from each of them, because they all come from different angles. The OT really can't be refuted as Jews have it as their own Scriptures even to this day. Doubt that? Talk to a rabbi. God has a claim on our lives, because he created us. You can't get around it. His plan is to have all those who believe in him and submit to him as Lord, join him in heaven and on the new heaven and new earth (yes, we won't be in heaven forever). Those who refuse to will go to hell and this is for forever. Even before that happens, everyone will acknowledge that he is God. Make your choice. You can fight God, but you will never win. If you really have doubts, keep on digging and you'll arrive at the truth, if you want to.
"So much information out there supporting the truth of the Bible and Jesus..."
There is a lot of information, yes — but the quality and credibility of that information matters.
Much of what people cite as “proof” (books like Evidence That Demands a Verdict, Case for Christ, etc.) are written by believers for believers, not by neutral historians or scholars.
"The person who influenced me was an atheist who set out to disprove Jesus..."
Are you referring to Lee Strobel? Author of "The Case for Christ"? If so Strobel was a journalist who converted to Christianity and wrote books defending it. But his "atheist turned Christian" narrative is personal testimony, not objective evidence. Many people convert in all directions — it's not proof of truth, just anecdotal.
"People reject Jesus because they don’t want to submit to him"
This is a psychological argument, not a logical or evidentiary one. It assumes nonbelievers are secretly convinced but rebellious — which is both condescending and inaccurate. Many people reject Christianity because they genuinely don’t find sufficient evidence, or because other worldviews make more sense to them.
"There’s a lot of academic work by unbelievers, agnostics, etc."
True: Scholars like Bart Ehrman (agnostic), Richard Carrier (atheist), John Dominic Crossan (liberal Christian) have studied the Bible critically. But they often disagree strongly with evangelical interpretations. Ehrman, for example, says the Bible is full of contradictions, was not written by eyewitnesses, and contains later legendary additions (e.g. the resurrection appearances).
"The Apostles were eyewitnesses and there are 4 accounts..."
The 4 Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, John) were not written by eyewitnesses, according to most mainstream scholars. They were written decades after Jesus's death, in Greek, by unknown authors. They also contradict each other on key details (e.g., Jesus's genealogy, resurrection timeline, who visited the tomb).
"The OT can’t be refuted — talk to a rabbi"
The Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) is sacred in Judaism, but Jews do not accept Christian interpretations of messianic prophecy. They don’t believe Jesus fulfilled the messianic criteria (e.g., rebuilding the temple, bringing world peace). Christian readings of the OT (like Isaiah 53 being about Jesus) are retrospective reinterpretations, not universally accepted truths.
"God has a claim on your life... choose now or go to hell"
This is theological belief, not evidence-based argument. Eternal damnation is part of Christian doctrine, but not accepted by other religions or secular ethics. Saying “you’ll go to hell if you don’t believe” is emotional coercion, not a rational argument.
Here's your reality check!
There is no independent, contemporary evidence for the resurrection of Jesus. The Gospels are religious texts, not objective biographies. Christianity is not the only religion with devoted followers, personal testimonies, and sacred texts. Hell, salvation, and divine authority are faith claims, not universal facts.
The apostles absolutely were eyewitnesses even if they wrote their accounts later. These so-called scholars do not have the Holy Spirit and without him you can't even understand what the Bible is saying. Look up people who were atheists and aren't anymore. I'm not going to do your research for you. Seems to me you have spent all your time in one camp. Do you know the history of this area of 'scholarly' research? Many years ago, these heresies crept in and these people went on to become the scholars you cite. Try searching out other material that will give you a more balanced view. I get tired of educating people like you who don't really care anyway - your mind is made up. Many people DO reject Jesus because they don't want to submit to him - they've told me so. Maybe that isn't true of you, but it is true of many people. Contradictions appear to be so, but aren't. Yes, they were eyewitnesses, that's a lie. Luke's gospel in the very beginning says he has read various manuscripts of which there are many, and he carefully writes this letter to Theophilus who needs to know if what he believes is true. Have you read the Gospels, Matt, Mark, Luke and John and asked God to show you if Jesus is true? Do that and see if things change for you. If you are bound to not believe, I can't help. We know a Jewish man who told us that he called out to God and asked him if Jesus really is the Messiah - and if so, to give him a sign. He was afterward struck by lightening. He didn't think that was the sign. So, he was struck a second time with lightening and he still didn't think he was getting a sign. We know him personally and he told us this story. What can I say. If you really want to know, seek him, because he says "Seek me and you will find me". All the evidence in the world cannot convince you like a personal encounter with Jesus.
Tony, I get it — "You haven't read it" is the go-to defense when someone critiques your favorite book. But I have read it — and more importantly, I've read the scholarship that interacts with it.
The issue isn't that "Evidence That Demands a Verdict" exists. It's that it's not actual evidence — it's apologetics. There's a difference between presenting arguments meant to persuade believers, and offering subjective, peer-reviewed historical analysis.
If you think quoting the Bible to prove the Bible is valid historical reasoning, that's the problem I'm pointing out — not ignoring.
Also, dismissing my critique by assuming ignorance instead of engaging with the points I made (like the authorship of the Gospels, lack of contemporary source, or theological circularity) is a classic dodge. You're not defending the content — you're just gatekeeping it.
I'm not dismissing something "I know nothing about." I'm dismissing something I know enough about to recognize as ideologically motivated and methodologically flawed.
But hey — if you've got actual evidence outside of faith-based testimonials and internal biblical claims, I'm always open to see it.
You are spot on. Makes so much sense, particularly after you see the extraordinary HUGE beds in the Egyptian museum. Like what the F!!! Only a GIANT would need furniture as that !
Have you seen their swords???? Unbelievable. I'll see if I can find the picture of it, excavated. Unbelievable. The Bible also references a giant in the Bible and gives the size of his bed, too.
Deut. 3: 11 (King Og of Bashan was the last survivor of the giant Rephaites. His bed was made of iron and was more than thirteen feet long and six feet wide. It can still be seen in the Ammonite city of Rabbah.)
They funded both sides of the major wars since the 1700. They funded Hitler. They loaned money to the Holy-See . Bought the Vatican under their control . The Pope kissed the feet of the Rothschilds and Henry Kissinger. You need to do a tiny bit of research. The term conspiracy theory coined by the CIA owned by the Rothschilds who own 90% of the world's wealth. Amy country who would not take their " IMF loans" were bombed. Senator Ron Johnson said yesterday that the US was responsible for 911. You are so far behind in understanding how the world works. Sprinkled with a lot of ignorance here.
Oh wait you are correct there are a few more names. Get educated !House of Bernadotte, Sweden
House of Bourbon, France
House of Braganza, Portugal
House of Grimaldi, Monaco
House of Guelph, Britain (the most important one)
House of Habsburg, Austria
House of Hanover, Germany (the second most important one)
House of Hohenzollern, Germany
House of Karadjordjevic, Yugoslavia (former)
House of Liechtenstein, Liechtenstein
House of Nassau, Luxembourg
House of Oldenburg, Denmark
House of Orange, Netherlands
House of Savoy, Italy
House of Wettin, Belgium
House of Wittelsbach, Germany
House of Württemberg, Germany
House of Zogu, Albania
All the families you will find on the Windsor family tree. (Queen Mum)
There is zero credible evidence that the Rothschild family funded “both sides of every war.” That’s a myth straight out of 19th-century antisemitic propaganda. This claim was popularized by fake quotes, forged documents, and Nazi-era disinformation. The Rothschilds were successful bankers — not war-summoning puppetmasters from a Bond film. If you think funding both sides of a war is a smart business model, congrats — you’ve never read a single actual history book.
“They funded Hitler.”
Let’s get this straight:
You’re saying a Jewish banking family funded Adolf fucking Hitler?
- That’s so historically illiterate it’s offensive.
- The Nazis blamed the Rothschilds, seized their assets, and forced them to flee Europe.
- They were explicitly targeted by Nazi racial laws.
- Saying the Rothschilds funded Hitler is like saying Anne Frank funded the Gestapo.
“They bought the Vatican. The Pope kissed their feet.”
Holy Dan Brown, Batman. Where’s your next claim — that the Freemasons cloned Jesus in a Denver airport bunker?
The Vatican has never been “bought” by anyone.
Popes have kissed the feet of many in symbolic gestures — not because they were owned.
This is religious conspiracy LARPing, not history.
“The CIA invented the term ‘conspiracy theory’ to protect the Rothschilds.”
100% false.
The term “conspiracy theory” dates back to the 19th century — long before the CIA existed.
The claim that the CIA invented it in 1967 is a misinterpretation of a declassified memo about JFK disinformation — not proof of a Rothschild coverup.
This is conspiracy inception: a conspiracy about the word “conspiracy.”
“They own 90% of the world’s wealth.”
Nope. That’s not even remotely true.
The Rothschilds are wealthy, sure, but they’re not even on Forbes’ top 100 billionaires anymore.
The idea that one family controls 90% of global wealth is mathematically insane and economically impossible.
If you believe that, you don’t understand how money, markets, or math work.
“Here's a giant list of royal families. Get educated!”
Wow. You found a list of European aristocracy on Wikipedia. Congratulations on learning to copy and paste.
Guess what? Most of these families are ceremonial relics with no real power.
Britain’s monarchy doesn’t run the world. Neither does Monaco’s.
Listing royal houses doesn’t prove a conspiracy — it proves you like typing names.
You could list every family in Game of Thrones and it would have the same evidentiary weight.
Read a book. Learn real history. Stop embarrassing yourself.
This sword is 7.5 feet long, found in a 4th-century Japanese tomb. It’s ceremonial, not functional. No one was swinging this around unless they were Godzilla with biceps. Ancient cultures made oversized weapons for ritual, burial, or symbolic reasons, not for battle.
Deuteronomy 3:11
"Og king of Bashan... his bed was made of iron and was more than thirteen feet long and six feet wide."
Yes, the Bible says that. But ancient texts are full of legendary exaggerations. Just like Goliath being over 9 feet tall — these are mythic elements, not historical measurements. The bed might have been symbolic, royal, or even a mistranslation. No archaeological evidence of Og or his bed has been found.
Man, the people in these comments are really uninformed. I got you though!
The Large beds or thrones found in museums (like Tutankhamun’s funeral bed) are often symbolic, ceremonial, or designed for status, not practical sleeping. Egyptian furniture was sometimes oversized for ritual, burial, or royal reasons, not because anyone was 15 feet tall. These beds were found in **tombs**, not bedrooms — they were spiritual props for the afterlife.
If we had only that post to rely on for proof, we'd be in trouble. Thankfully, there is a ton of information on this pyramid phenomenon and what it's all about is still being discovered. However, the preciseness of the stones at that time would have been impossible without extra knowledge and strength coming from somewhere. Consider the evidence and draw your own conclusions, but I think the feats of architecture, combined with the available tools and knowhow, combined with the reliefs that show gigantic individuals wearing headdresses to cover their elongated skulls, combined with museums showing the same skulls, combined with other evidence gives a pretty good case for 'other than human' intervention. And, remember that I'm not the one who made the post, I only agreed with it. No one should ever think we know all. Though it's not my wheelhouse, there are a lot of people who dig and study, think and research and keep doing so. These are people with advanced degrees in what they do. Much of what is 'out there' has been buried for some reason, I don't know why. But, there are secrets all around us that intrigue human beings. When they are discovered, we often find that we were already told about them in Scripture.
Ok, William. I see that all your responses to me are of the same ilk: prove it. So, let's just part ways. Spirituality is a thing of faith. Not everything can be proven. Prove there is love in your heart. No, you can't. You live in one dimension - your physical senses and your logic. It doesn't address things you can't see or touch. See and touch a demon or evil for me? You can't do it, so according to you: it doesn't exist. You weary me. Goodbye.
I believe that we are the ones so say behind. If you look at the free electricity from the 1800's brought down through the aether and run along the ground you know this knowledge was hidden. It's only know that we find out that the CIA has reversed engineered the space ships and been using them since the 1940's at taxpayers expenses. I would assume that the Rothschild's with their elongated skulls have all this information tucked away in the Vatican. 🇨🇦
Our DOD has been working with 'aliens' demons for quite a while. I have read an article and seen a video by a whistleblower about it - that's why we're the leader in weaponry.
“Our DOD has been working with 'aliens' demons for quite a while... that's why we're the leader in weaponry.”
The idea that the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) is working with aliens or demons is absurd and unsupported by any credible evidence. There are no verifiable documents, no confirmed eyewitnesses, and no physical proof. Claims like this often cite anonymous sources, YouTube videos, or articles on fringe websites — not peer-reviewed science or verified intel leaks.
Many conspiracy theorists — especially from fundamentalist Christian backgrounds — reframe aliens as demonic entities. This is not based on science, astronomy, theology, or military records — it's just personal belief. Aliens = demons is a faith-based interpretation, not a testable theory.
The U.S. leads in military tech because of:
Massive defense budgets (e.g. $800+ billion/year)
Advanced R&D in aerospace, AI, cyber warfare
Global military-industrial complex
Long-term investment in DARPA, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, etc.
“This comes from interviews of ex-military men who were there.”
That’s not proof, that’s just hearsay — anecdotes without verification.
Anyone can claim anything in an interview — especially on platforms like YouTube, Rumble, or fringe Substacks, where there’s no fact-checking, peer review, or accountability.
If someone said they fought aliens with a lightsaber in Area 51, would you believe that too?
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Not a guy in night vision goggles saying “trust me, bro.”
There are zero declassified documents, no biometric data, no radar logs, no photographs, and no verifiable chain of custody for anything involving “alien demons” working with the DoD.
This is a misinterpretation of Nikola Tesla’s work. Tesla explored wireless transmission of electricity and theorized about the “aether” as a medium — a concept that was debunked by modern physics (especially after Einstein). The idea of “free energy” or “over-unity devices” is a pseudoscientific myth which violates the laws of thermodynamics.
**There is no evidence that free energy tech existed, let alone that it was suppressed.**
The aether isn't real, and free electricity didn’t exist in the 1800s. Tesla was brilliant, but not a magician.
"CIA has reverse engineered the space ships since the 1940s..."
There is no credible evidence that the CIA (or any agency) has reverse-engineered alien spacecraft. The U.S. government has studied UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) — but no proof of aliens. Declassified documents show interest in spy planes, not flying saucers.
"At taxpayers’ expense"
This part is almost accidentally true. Governments do waste money, but not on spacecraft reverse engineering. Classic conspiracy populism: "They're using your money to hide the truth!"
"Tucked away in the Vatican"
The Vatican is often invoked in conspiracy theories as a secret knowledge vault. Yes, the Vatican Library is private — but millions of documents are religious, historical, or administrative, not secret UFO files. Nothing credible links the Vatican to alien tech suppression.
This is not just wrong. It's a greatest-hits playlist of fringe internet theories.
It's a commonly used phrase, not literally meant. I offer this modification "I have little doubt" and that does not come from what someone told me. I've been doing my own reading, watching, etc. of people more science oriented than I am - and those who do archeological digs, have museums of these enlongated skulls, etc. I have little doubt, based on my own analysis, not indoctrination.
Rebecca, Thank you for your well thought out comments! You are on the right track. I can always tell when someone has put in the time to do their own search. It is an individual journey for truth. Me must drown out the chatter of biased opinions and indoctrinated beliefs. I appreciate you & hope that others will do the same. It is not up to us(as individuals) to convince anyone else of what we have found. If these people care to find truth, they will start their journey for it. IF they do, they WILL find it. I truly hope that all will take that step, as it is more imminent than ever. I would suggest to start at the Heart of Jesus. Who was He? What did he Truly teach? I started by looking into the “Historical Jesus”. If we get to know Him & His authentic message for (ALL) of humanity, He will start leading us & reveal so much more. He knocks on the door of every heart. So many people lock it or slam it back in his face. Surrender what we “think” we already know, and watch life transform into Heaven, here & now! Heaven doesn’t have to wait…
I love this. Like me, and so many others, we WANT people to come to know Jesus. They don't understand now what we know they will understand with so much remorse, regret later, but there will be no way to help them then. I am glad people here have thoughtfully engaged, for the most part. We just need to pray that these seeds will germinate and that people will begin to seek Jesus, because our very lives depend on it. Thank you Heather.
Awesome video! I've been saying for decades, that the pyramids at Giza are power plants. They are antediluvian fallen angel structures....built by the nephilim. That's the truth that the Holy Spirit revealed to me...
Same here! I saw a video by a Christian scholar who said that we misunderstand the capabilities of angels, namely here, the evil, fallen angels who mated with women and produced 'the mighty men of old". He said that we think of them like we see on Valentine's cards, etc., but in truth, they are highly mathematical, technological creatures. This makes sense to me.
Hi, I'm not a biblical scholar and have not studied NT or OT. It seems like the nephilim are typically portrayed as "bad" or dangerous, part of the corruption and violence that led to divine judgment, and appear before the flood. I'm curious if you can speak more on this, and I'm curious if you see parallels between this and what we're experiencing today in the United States with respect to the tech industry and billionaires.
Hi Sarah, the Nephilim in the Bible are the result of the union between the fallen angels (demons, evil spirits) and women. They were evil and had human beings serving them and began eating them as food. Biblical scholars and archeologists who have dug them up believe they are the giants of old that the Bible refers to. The giants are mentioned off and on in the OT when Israel was trying to take land that God had given them. They once remarked "We are like grasshoppers to them". I thought that was metaphorical until I began to see proofs of giants, swords, beds, skeletons, etc. Britain who has giants in their history and Egypt both have statues of giants reflecting their knowledge of giants in their histories. Pyramids and ziggurat's were used for religious worship and at the top of them human sacrifice was practiced. Demons thrive from massacres of people. There is quite a bit of info out there, but it's scattered and has to be discovered and pieced together. It has been hidden, but is more and more coming out. The reason God sent the flood was to eradicate the Nephilim. He said that evil had become so great over the entire earth that it had to be wiped out and started over. Noah and his family's bloodline had not been contaminated with demonic DNA, so he was saved, with his family to begin the human line again - through which the blood of humans would be pure, eventually leading to Jesus himself. This is part of the spiritual war that has been going on since before creation. Those parts are recorded in Isaiah and Ezekiel, I believe. I'll put some articles here for you to read and investigate.
This article will give you the various views among theologians along with the various Scriptures. I adhere to the demonic/fallen angels one, because of the size of the skeletons that I've seen of giants....what would produce that? human + supernatural being = supersized evil being. https://www.gotquestions.org/Nephilim.html
There is more than one war in heaven in the Bible, but all of them are caused by Lucifer (his original name) or Satan (his name once he fell). It can be commonly seen in the Bible that God changes names of people based on significant life changes that change identity, essentially. (Abram - to Abraham, Sari to Sarah, etc.). Satan was originally named "Lucifer" = light bringer, but he lost that name when he fell from heaven (Jesus recalls "I saw Satan fall like Lightening from heaven). Anyway, I am putting a couple of articles here that talk about the wars of heaven.
Tech billionaires and most uber wealthy people (WEF, etc.) are building the one-world system where Satan will finally get to have the kingdom on earth that he has wanted. Some of them have been deceived into thinking that it will be for humanity's good, "we can make everybody be good". But, they themselves are not good, nor can humanity be forced to be as God gave all of us our being (being made in his image, we are autonomous and free, as he is). Satan will demand complete ownership of all on earth and worship of him. So, he is setting up - through the tech billionaires and others - a system where everyone can be tracked, traced, etc. and everyone will have to take a 'mark' - an electronically reactive 'mark' that will give them a digital file and continuously detail all they do. They are also looking at a way to wipe out the gene that recognizes God and responds to him - Satan wants to be god...can't be god when humans are aware of the real God. He will set up an 'image' of himself and everyone must bow down wherever they are when the image appears. I think it will be a hologram, which are amazingly realistic. The book of Daniel previews an event like this before the king - and they would not bow down. A hologram will allow this to appear anywhere on earth simultaneously. They are advancing this system at high speed - Trump appointed 3 men to work on this system 2 days into his term. I don't know how many Christians realized this. Many did. We know where this will lead. BUT, God is the ultimate gatekeeper and this will only happen in God's timing according to his plan. Babylon was the first attempt on earth, and you know how long ago that was - and they've been working at it ever since....so, time is short, but how short, we don't know.
I really appreciated this in depth response - with sources - to the question. One of the reasons I love Greg’s comment section. So many informed and erudite readers🙏✨🙏
Thank you! I love Greg Reese because his reports are so concise, packed with info in a short time. I enjoy the people here, too. I love learning from others. One person can't get around to everything, but between us sharing, we all come away with more info and understanding than we would on our own. I'm on a laptop, so I don't know how to get the emojis but have a prayerful and blessed day, too :)
“The Nephilim in the Bible are the result of the union between the fallen angels and women... and began eating [humans] as food.”
What the Bible actually says (per GotQuestions):
Genesis 6:4 mentions the Nephilim as “heroes of old, men of renown.”
Theories about their origin include:
“Sons of God” = fallen angels who mated with women
OR “Sons of God” = powerful human rulers
There is no biblical support for the idea that the Nephilim ate humans.
The view that they were cannibalistic hybrid giants is from legends and conspiracy literature, not Scripture.
No biblical or archaeological evidence supports the claim that Nephilim ate humans. That’s myth, not theology.
“I began to see proofs of giants, swords, beds, skeletons, etc.”
Claims of giant skeletons have been repeatedly debunked.
Many photos of “giant skeletons” online are Photoshop hoaxes or misidentified archaeological finds.
The Smithsonian, National Geographic, and archaeologists do not recognize any evidence of human skeletons over 12 feet tall.
No verified “giant skeletons” exist. The idea is based on internet hoaxes and misinterpretation of burial artifacts.
“Satan fell before creation... Tech billionaires are building the one-world system for him.”
What Compelling Truth actually says:
Satan’s fall occurred before humanity was created (not before all of creation).
His rebellion was rooted in pride, not AI or surveillance.
The article discusses spiritual rebellion, not political or technological conspiracies.
The leap from biblical theology to tech billionaires as Satan’s agents is pure speculation — not biblical and not supported by the article YOU cited.
“Trump appointed 3 men to work on this system... everyone will take a mark... it’ll be a hologram image of Satan.”
Trump partnered with tech leaders (Sam Altman, Larry Ellison, etc.) to launch the Stargate Project, a massive AI infrastructure initiative.
The article wildly speculates that this is tied to transhumanism, mRNA tech, and global control — but it’s Icke’s conspiracy spin, not evidence-based journalism.
No mention of Satan, holograms, or biblical prophecy in the actual press releases or project documentation.
This is David Icke-level conspiracy theory, not fact. The project is about AI and data centers, not building the Antichrist’s kingdom.
“God sent the flood to eradicate the Nephilim... Noah’s bloodline wasn’t contaminated by demonic DNA.”
What GotQuestions says:
This theory is one interpretation — not a biblical certainty.
The Bible says God sent the flood because “every inclination of the thoughts of the human heart was only evil all the time” (Genesis 6:5).
The idea of “demonic DNA” is modern pseudoscience slapped onto ancient text — never mentioned in Scripture.
“Everyone will have to take a mark... I think it will be a hologram... appear anywhere on earth.”
The “Mark of the Beast” (Revelation 13) is symbolic or prophetic — interpretations vary widely.
There is no biblical mention of holograms or AI in the text.
The idea that modern tech fulfills prophecy is speculative theology, not supported by evidence or Scripture.
Rebecca. Your post is a blend of folklore, fringe theology, and full-blown conspiracy theory. YOU reference sources that don’t even say what YOU claim they say.
This isn’t theology — it’s apocalyptic fan fiction.
Yes, I side with the fallen angels, because something has to account for the humungous size of them and regular humans who are powerful rulers would not make their size any different than ordinary people.
Genesis 1:1 earth was created & populated with life, by the Elohim FAMILY of GodS.
Fallen angels hijacked earth, taught men civilization skills, and built civilizations. THEY built the pyramids, monolithic structures, Nasca lines, etc. and ruled as gods (Enki, Enlil, Shiva, Vishnu, Viracocha, Quetzalcoatl, Osiris, etc.)
Genesis 1:2 earth BECAME a destroyed wasteland, as described in Jeremiah 4:23-28. Fallen angel civilizations destroyed and they went underground.
See “Ancient Apocalypse” on Netflix, 14 seasons of “Ancient Aliens”, (supported by 2 Peter 3:5-6 & Isaiah 24:1, Ecclesiastes 1:9, Ezekiel chapter 31).
The phrase “without form, and void” is only used twice in the Bible, and I believe they are describing the same event - destruction of “the old world” mentioned in the Bible. It is NOT USED to describe Noah’s Flood (which was REGIONAL).
THE PYRAMIDS OF GIZA AND THE COMING POLE SHIFT THE MESSAGE IN PLAIN SIGHT WATCH TILL THE END
Here is a good article on the Elohim, as I wrote below that I don't think you have it right. This website is very sound, so I looked the question up and I thought their answer was very good. https://www.gotquestions.org/meaning-of-Elohim.html
The problem with a lot of materials out there is that they are written by people who are not born again - they are scholars looking at the Bible, etc. or they are Christianized, but they are not born again (with the HS) and that makes all the difference.
A couple of things... Elohim....don't know that you have it right. We are not really told who they are and there is much speculation. I am now hearing the heresy that Yahweh was only one of the Elohim, not the ultimate GOD, which is heresy through and through. I have to do some research on this word in Hebrew and find out more. God does not mention anything about the Elohim being on earth when he created Adam and Eve. I have to read more on this. Also - the flood was not at all regional - it was global in nature...where did you get this idea? Just curious. I don't think we can assume there was an 'old world' and the one we are currently in. We touched on that in seminary, but I can't remember much about it, only that it was speculative, at best.
Please help me understand your viewpoint. You believe that Satan and Elohims has deceived the whole world right? But you call heresy the thought that the Hebrew god is not the ultimate god because HE said that he is the real god? How do you know his true purpose, his true identity? Ive read that Corrando Malanga, one of the guys on this pyramid research who is studying alien abductions believes that gods of all cultures were aliens. He says they want our souls to achieve immortality and religion makes it easier to willingly transfer. This makes much more sense too me, the Hebrew god to be just another deceiver while the ultimate god isnt really bothered with his creation, and that is if he exists.
In terms of your question: I have yet to determine what I think about the Elohim, but Satan is definitely evil and his angels (fallen angels, demons - which I believe ARE aliens) feast off humanity in many ways. YES, they want our souls. I didn't know why, but I think he is probably right - to achieve immortality.
This article is a good rundown of how Satan, who was originally named "Lucifer" fell from heaven and became 'the devil' or Satan. He is also known and worshipped under those labels as well as others, such as Beelzebub. His fall was due to him arranging a coup to take God's throne - 1/3 of the angels (we're told there are myriads and myriads) went in on it with him - these are the aliens that live among the planets and falsify religions to draw people to himself through several avenues.
I have always believed that Almighty God is the God of the Bible and was brought up in a family who also believed, so we were into our Bibles from infancy, really since we were Baptist Protestant (they believe we should know the entire Bible). We attended church throughout my growing up and I went to Christian high school as well, finally totally receiving Jesus as my Savior in college. Throughout that time, I experienced him in many comforting and helpful ways. When we receive Jesus as our Savior, the Holy Spirit comes into us to mark us as Jesus's and our nature begins to change to desire what God desires and to become like Jesus.
The reason I believe (know) that Jesus is God (and Yahweh is his Father - though the Trinity is ONE God) is because of the changes he makes in people's lives and the ministry of the Holy Spirit that I have experienced and as I see others experience. I have not seen this with any other religion.
Other cultures with other gods remain in poverty, with poor hygiene/health knowledge, draconian religious rules and leaders, harsh punishments, rule keeping, etc. Christianity came out of cultures like that - originating in the OT with Abraham who was called out of Babylon - a very pagan culture. Yahweh presented a whole new way of living to his people (the Israelites), including dietary laws, etc. (down to that level). The Christian God (Yahweh, Jesus and the Holy Spirit) transforms us and transforms people and cultures who accept him as their God. The rules in the OT that people think are insane were training for these new people who had to be trained away from pagan religions (at the time they required human sacrifice, orgies, etc. - very dark) and he trained them in His ways - the opposite ways. In these pagan cultures when people become Christians, they change into new people entirely for the better and remain changed even though they live in the midst of a culture that has not changed. So, it's the proof I've seen in my own life, in other's lives, knowing the Bible well, etc. and no other God has offered eternal life to people by dying for them (Jesus is God). The gods of pagan religions require people to die for them, or injure themselves or others for their benefit. God would never think of such a thing. Since we were made in God's image, we too understand that this is evil. So, it's a combination of things that makes me believe that Yahweh is God.
Sounds like two sides of same coin. Good deceiver/bad deceiver. Feelings is not knowledge. I dont think you are thinking this all the way deep due to being grown to it, i understand it can be very hard to escape but you should try.
I appreciate your thinking, but I didn't believe until I was in college! So, I definitely didn't accept any grooming :). Where do you think I'm not thinking this deeply?
"Genesis 1:1 earth was created & populated with life, by the Elohim FAMILY of GodS."
The Hebrew word “Elohim” is grammatically plural, but in context is almost always used as a singular title for the one true God of Israel — not a “family” of gods.
This is not the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Ancient Hebrew writers were monotheists, not polytheists or alien worshippers.
The idea that earth was "populated with life" before Genesis 1:2 is not in the text — it's a conspiracy theory known as the Gap Theory, which lacks biblical or scientific support.
"Fallen angels hijacked earth, built civilizations like the pyramids, Nasca lines, etc., and were worshipped as gods."
This is straight out of the TV show Ancient Aliens and has zero archaeological evidence. The pyramids were built by skilled Egyptian laborers using known techniques — no aliens, no demons, just geometry, labor, and time.
The Nasca lines? Created by the Nasca people using simple tools and surveying techniques.
Deities like Osiris, Shiva, and Quetzalcoatl are from entirely different cultures and timelines — lumping them all together as “fallen angels” is historical nonsense.
"Genesis 1:2 earth BECAME a destroyed wasteland... fallen angel civilizations destroyed it."
The “earth was without form and void” is a Hebrew poetic phrase (tohu wa-bohu) meaning chaotic and unformed, not post-apocalyptic.
Jeremiah 4:23–28 is not about Genesis — it’s a poetic prophecy of judgment on Judah, not a description of pre-Adamic destruction.
“Gap Theory” (that there was a world before Genesis 1:2) is not mainstream theology, and has no archaeological or scriptural backing.
"Watch ‘Ancient Apocalypse’ and ‘Ancient Aliens’ — it’s all supported by Bible verses."
These shows are entertainment, not scholarship. They rely on speculative claims, out-of-context quotes, and zero peer-reviewed evidence. Quoting 2 Peter 3, Isaiah, or Ecclesiastes doesn’t magically validate pseudoarchaeology. The Bible doesn’t support the idea of ancient aliens running Atlantis.
"The Zep Tepi Theory proves the pyramids are older than we think."
The Zep Tepi (“First Time”) is a mythological era in Egyptian texts — not a historical date. Claims that the pyramids date back to 36,000 BC are completely unsupported by radiocarbon dating, archaeological layers, or Egyptian chronology. The Great Pyramid was built around 2560 BCE, during the reign of Khufu, using local limestone, copper tools, and manpower — no mystery required.
“Zep Tepi” is myth, not alternate history.
"The Pyramids of Giza and the coming pole shift are connected!"
There's no evidence of an imminent pole shift that will destroy the world. Magnetic pole reversals are well understood, take thousands of years, and have no connection to pyramids or prophecies. “The message in plain sight” is usually code for “I’m making this up but it sounds cool.”
"Genesis 1:3 is earth being replenished after the destruction of the angel civilization."
Genesis 1:3 says: "And God said, 'Let there be light.'" That’s the beginning of creation, not a reboot of Atlantis. The idea that the world was “replenished” comes from KJV mistranslations and imaginative theology, not the actual Hebrew text.
Genesis 1 is not about rebuilding a demon-destroyed earth.
I've studied pyramid research for a very long time. And it has been clear that pyramids are machines. At this point, we still can't know what those machines were constructed for. But they are most certainly NOT tombs. They were most likely used for obtaining free energy. With all of the other information that has been discovered on the previous civilization of Grand Tartary, it becomes very clear that they used structures to draw energy from the aether and The Earth ... also think about "cathedrals." It is evident that The Tartarians had developed an amazingly advanced civilization. Of course, our evil usurpers, who have created their New World Order, also created the false history narrative called Scaligerian History. They have also erased much of our true history and destroyed most of those amazing buildings and structures.
Which of the ideas shared on OWN did you find most compelling?
I can't say I was impressed by Old World Order (2024) at all. I say that as someone who has a life-long and active interest in discerning reality from fiction/belief, ancient knowledge, ancient history, mysticism, etc. From my perspective, most of what was conveyed in OWO was sadly laughable. I get that they're intentions are "good" but those who are deceived will always end up deceiving. In this case, those who are misguided are giving out misdirection.
The structures and buildings that they show, cannot be built by anyone today.
Architects themselves have no idea how they were built.
We see a similar story with the pyramids.
The buildings in the documentary have fake, made up historical narratives attached to them. Built within a year, during the days when we only had horse and buggy and still wiping our asses with our hands (according to the mainstream narrative) and before the invention of power tools.
It's silly. They are children stories for adults.
I personally don't care if you or anyone is impressed or not. If you're not impressed by the architecture then you're clearly just as blind as everyone else.
The narratives, and timelines are way off. How they date things to (insert made up time here) is nonsense as well.
This film, ties nicely in with another documentary called "The Lost History of Flat Earth", and answers a lot of questions one would have after watching OWOrder.
But any time we mention FE... that's when people stop listening.
The Lost History of FE is barely even about the shape of the earth, but about things hidden in plain sight, things we see every day... and they didn't even go into what Rocks, mountains, Mesas, etc actually are... however Greg Reese here had on a guy named Stellium7, and he goes deep into that field... what Geology actually is. We're calling it "Biogeology" now, because geology is all biological.
If you don't believe that last part... have a look through Greg's videos. Look for the episode with Stellium7. His real name is Michael Wilkerson.
“The structures and buildings they show cannot be built by anyone today. Architects have no idea how they were built.”
This is flat-out false. Engineers and archaeologists do know how ancient monuments were built. We’ve documented the tools, techniques, labor forces, and construction sequences for the Great Pyramids, Roman aqueducts, Gothic cathedrals, and more.
Example: The Great Pyramid of Giza was built using:
Copper chisels
Lever systems
Limestone blocks
Massive labor forces (not slaves)
Modern reconstructions (e.g., by National Geographic and NOVA) have replicated ancient construction techniques on a smaller scale — successfully.
We can build them — and we have replicated how.
“The buildings have fake made-up historical narratives attached to them... built in a year during the buggy era before power tools.”
The suggestion that cathedrals or pyramids were built in a single year is historically and logistically laughable. Many Gothic cathedrals took decades to centuries to complete — and we have detailed construction records, inscriptions, and documentation to support this.
Your implication that people were “wiping with their hands” and couldn’t build advanced architecture is chronologically ignorant. Human ingenuity didn’t begin with power tools.
You have a basic misunderstanding of historical timelines and documented construction methods.
“The timelines are way off. How they date things is nonsense.”
Dating methods like radiocarbon dating, dendrochronology, thermoluminescence, and stratigraphy are science-based, peer-reviewed, and used across disciplines. These methods consistently correlate with written records, astronomical events, and even volcanic ash layers. “Everything was built more recently” is a claim with zero support from actual archaeologists or historians.
Just because YouTubers doubt dating methods doesn’t mean science is wrong.
“This ties in with The Lost History of Flat Earth. People stop listening when we mention FE...”
Yep. Because Flat Earth is 100% debunked pseudoscience. We have satellite imagery, physics, circumnavigation, photos from the ISS, and even airline flight paths that only work on a globe. The fact that you tie OWO to Flat Earth theory shows just how far from credible this worldview is.
Associating with Flat Earth instantly discredits the rest.
“Geology is fake. It’s actually ‘biogeology’ — rocks are biological.”
“Biogeology” is not a real term. Rocks are not bones, and mountains are not the fossilized corpses of ancient titans. This idea comes from Stellium7 (Michael Wilkerson) — a YouTuber with no geological credentials, who claims rock formations are giant petrified animals. Real geologists can show mineral composition, crystalline structure, and tectonic processes that explain rock formations without invoking fantasy biology.
“Architects have no idea how these things were built.”
This is an insult to the entire field of architectural history and civil engineering.
We have texts like:
Vitruvius’s De Architectura (1st century BCE)
Ancient Egyptian construction records
Medieval cathedral blueprints
Modern architects study these in universities. We know exactly how structures like the Pantheon, Hagia Sophia, and Notre Dame were engineered.
Architects and historians know a lot. YOU just don't read them.
“So... you think Stellium7 is just making it all up eh?”
Yes. Because he is.
Michael Wilkerson (a.k.a. Stellium7) is a YouTuber with no geological training who believes mountains are petrified organs and rocks are fossilized giants. That’s not science. That’s mythology.
You can’t just throw out everything we know about mineralogy, tectonics, erosion, and crystallization because a guy with zero qualifications found a rock shaped like a kidney and called it a giant’s heart.
“Peer review is comical”? That’s rich.
You just admitted you don’t trust peer review, which is literally the foundation of modern science. You know — the process that:
Filters out false claims,
Forces transparency,
Requires reproducibility,
And separates fact from fantasy.
But sure, some random dude on YouTube with no credentials and a Patreon link? Totally legit.
That’s like saying “doctors are a scam” while trusting your medical advice from a guy who sells crystals on Etsy.
“So many clowns around here…”
You’ve done zero research, ignored every fact I posted, and instead of countering the evidence, you:
Called people clowns, mocked peer review, and repeated the name of your favorite internet guru like it’s gospel. You’re not debating. You’re projecting — because deep down, you know your worldview collapses the second you have to explain it without YouTube videos.
“You’re a fine example of the brainwashed mind.”
That’s the go-to line for every conspiracy theorist when they’re cornered by facts:
No, Brandon — I’m informed.
I read academic journals, not fringe Substacks and echo-chamber Telegram channels.
If you think education = brainwashing and scientific literacy = indoctrination, then you’re not having a conversation — you’re having a cult experience.
I'm not a fan of "fact-checking" sites in general, but as this particular article essentially corroborates all of my own findings (or lack thereof), plus a bit more, it's easier to share this article than to write out all the details of my investigation into this story.
And Greg, the reason its important to know that the Evil are from Orion is because Orion used to be a violent, patriarchal civilization. Over time the females began having input and influence, and ultimately equal power, and Orion became a PEACEFUL, prosperous civilization. Which was good, except the young sons of the King and Queen were bored.
So when they came to Earth to set up their mining industry they deliberately created their labor force (us) to include the 'reptilian brain', which is violent and aggressive.
That way, the King's sons can play their war games here, and build a massive violent aggressive military and attack anyone who comes near Earth.
And by socially engineering the false patriarchy into OUR population it assures the Evil that the males and females here cannot achieve the balance of strength, and empower the human population, and together create a PEACEFUL Earth, because WARS ARE NECESSARY for culling the males. As any good farmer knows, you can't have too many bulls in the herd!
Hence our Reptilian Brain.
So knowing that the Evil are from Orion explains why we are reincarnationally trapped in a violent, perverted prison farm run by psychopathic SPACE TRASH from Orion!!
I'm telling you Greg, we need to take the White Pill, the once in every 25,000year opportunity to escape, and blow this popsicle stand!
Agree. They at least had the capability to communicate with them.
I'm still watching the clip, but @ 1:50, those pillars they found... I believe them to be coils, just like they are on "old world" buildings (like our White House, and EVERY single Capital Building).
To Per Thomsen - Take a look at a documentary that came out last year called
I think there was definitely a wireless energy grid. It was probably used as a direct energy weapon during the reset of the late 1700's, early 1800's. Then they used the World Fairs to destroy most of the evidence of this grid and get us on their wired control grid.
Highest compliment here, but Greg Reese's incredible narration could make a simple trip to the bathroom one of the most astonishing and mysterious things ever discovered. I mean this with deepest respect for Greg's skillset.
Cylinders arranged under ground ?! Didn't that whistle-blower (can't remember his name) say there was the same type of thing at a "research" base in Antarctica?
Satan is the great mimicker of God. Don't forget that he was one of the highest angels in heaven before he challenged God's rule and sought out his throne. Think of all the knowledge he and his followers (1/3 of the heavenly angels) had when they lost that coup attempt and were kicked out of heaven. Jesus said that he saw Satan fall like lightening. Satan, once called Lucifer, ceased to be the light bringer he once was. Jesus called himself "the true light" that came into the world: Satan is the false light. He offered Adam and Eve the opportunity to join him in his world absent and opposite of God. They succumbed, because the picture he painted them were lies and deceptions. It is not surprising that his religion - seen here in this video - is very much like God's. As intelligent as Jordan Maxwell is, I think some of his 'observances' about Jesus and the 12 were pointed out to him by the one who has led him completely astray. Sadly, he got lost in this and I don't expect to see him in heaven. Yes, all this is true in Catholicism, hence the Protestant Reformation where the original early church that grew up into a large following split apart when the corruption in the original church became overwhelmingly great. Protestants do not follow these synchronistic rituals, etc. - except the major Christian holidays are on the dates you pointed out. Pagan religions as shown, had horrible 'worship' identical to Satanism. True Christianity decries all of those things as wicked. While there are some things to be seen as similar or synchronistic, the vast majority of the Bible bears no comparison to paganism, nor does the practice of Christianity or the success of nations built upon Christianity. Hence, the comparison is limited to similar symbols, etc. Sadly, Jordan Maxwell, who had the uncanny ability to see the duplication of word and symbols everywhere, seemed not to be able to see the truth that Satan obscured from him.
Jesus. The Alpha and Omega. A Holy God. King of Kings. He is God. Who is God? He is Jesus. And to Him we have to answer. Why does it make men uncomfortable or angry or dismissive? Because we have to accept we are sinners and lost and in need of a Saviour. God sent His Son to save us. Without Him, we are lost. The Holy Bible gives us all we ever need for answers.
The Hebrew name of the devil is Helel. Lucifer is the Latin name for Helel.
Eve was deceived by the serpent. Adam was not deceived, but partook because they were one flesh, bone of his bone. Adam partook to SAVE EVE and their progeny, which became Israelites.
Jesus was the firstborn of the offspring Begotten in heaven before the foundations of the earth were laid, and under primogeniture, Jesus was the first to visit earth in a physical body AS ADAM. Jesus is The First and Last ADAM!
First and last Adam
1 Corinthians 15:45
“And so it is written, *The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam (Jesus) was made a quickening spirit.*
46 Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual
47 *The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven.*
First and last (Adam)
Revelation 1:11
Saying, *I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last:* and, What thou seest, write in a book, and send it unto the seven churches which are in Asia; unto Ephesus, and unto Smyrna, and unto Pergamos, and unto Thyatira, and unto Sardis, and unto Philadelphia, and unto Laodicea
I agree with most of this. Adam was enticed by the Serpent and Eve. However, Adam was there first for some time before God created Eve out of his rib. Adam was the head of the human race, not Eve. As a result, God clearly laid the burden of the fall of humanity and of the world on Adam. "Through one MAN'S sin, all died". It was through Adam, not Eve, that the fall took place as Adam had headship in the Garden and had the responsibility to watch over Eve, which he did not do. When he saw that Eve was being tempted, he did nothing and nothing to stop her from eating of the fruit. Why? He was standing right there, because after she ate of it, he waited and she offered him some and then he ate. I believe the reason was because he wanted to see if God was telling them the truth. Once he saw that Eve did not die (immediately), he too took the fruit. I often notice that men want to put the blame on Eve for the downfall of the world and also that they want to justify or make an excuse for Adam's sin because of Eve's sin. This is quite sad, because not only is this not true according to to Scripture, but also shows the male ego to justify himself just as Adam did in the garden (Eve gave it to me) rather than to simply be honest and admit to Adam's sin as being the one that started the domino effect. If Adam had, in fact, tried to save Eve, he would have knocked the fruit out of her hand, and taken her away from the serpent, but that is not what was happening. Adam was just as interested in it and failed to act as the head of the family and protect Eve. The idea that they were one flesh does not hold water. Even as 'one flesh' they each had their own choice and chose to sin.
Well we do not know if Adam was right there and saw it all.
But woman is so naturally disobedient if she had not disobeyed God the next woman would have. Woman or man we are all naturally sinful inclined to lawlessness. We all need a Saviour God. What would we do without Him?
Sky, you need to read the Bible! Here is the account from Genesis 2-3
Genesis 2:7Then the LORD God formed man from the dust of the ground and breathed the breath of life into his nostrils, and the man became a living being.
8And the LORD God planted a garden in Eden, in the east, where He placed the man He had formed. 9Out of the ground the LORD God gave growth to every tree that is pleasing to the eye and good for food. And in the middle of the garden were the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
15Then the LORD God took the man and placed him in the Garden of Eden to cultivate and keep it.
16And the LORD God commanded him, “You may eat freely from every tree of the garden, 17but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil; for in the day that you eat of it, you will surely die.”
18The LORD God also said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make for him a suitable helper.”
19And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the air, and He brought them to the man to see what he would name each one. And whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name. 20The man gave names to all the livestock, to the birds of the air, and to every beast of the field. But for Adame no suitable helper was found.
21So the LORD God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep, and while he slept, He took one of the man’s ribsf and closed up the area with flesh. 22And from the rib that the LORD God had taken from the man, He made a woman and brought her to him. 23And the man said:
“This is now bone of my bones
and flesh of my flesh;
she shall be called ‘woman,’
for out of man she was taken.”
24For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh.g
25And the man and his wife were both naked, and they were not ashamed.
This shows that God made Adam first, then created Eve from a rib in his body - from his side, to be next to his side (not from his feet to be under him or from his head, to be over him). There was no mate for Adam (beastiality is wrong).
Now, as you can see Adam was given the command FIRST. He knew the law FIRST. This is what we call 'headship'. He was first in the garden and he represented all of humanity ( since all of humanity would follow from Adam and Eve).
Next:
Genesis, Chapter 3
Berean Standard Bible Par ▾
The Serpent’s Deception
(Romans 5:12–21)
1Now the serpenta was more crafty than any beast of the field that the LORD God had made. And he said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden?’”
2The woman answered the serpent, “We may eat the fruit of the trees of the garden, 3but about the fruit of the tree in the middle of the garden, God has said, ‘You must not eat of it or touch it, or you will die.’”
4“You will not surely die,” the serpent told the woman. 5“For God knows that in the day you eat of it, your eyes will be opened and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”
6When the woman saw that the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eyes, and that it was desirable for obtaining wisdom, she took the fruit and ate it.
Here is where the Bible said Adam was there while all this was happening. Eve was deceived. What did Adam do, since he was the head of the garden) to protect her? Why did he let her get seduced by the serpent? Why didn't he break in and recite God's command and take Eve away or knock the fruit out of her hand?
She also gave some to her husband who was with her, and he ate it.
7And the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked; so they sewed together fig leaves and made coverings for themselves.
So, they both sinned, but God holds Adam, not Eve for the downfall, because Adam was the head, the leader. Berean Standard Bible Par ▾
The Serpent’s Deception
(Romans 5:12–21)
1Now the serpenta was more crafty than any beast of the field that the LORD God had made. And he said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden?’”
2The woman answered the serpent, “We may eat the fruit of the trees of the garden, 3but about the fruit of the tree in the middle of the garden, God has said, ‘You must not eat of it or touch it, or you will die.’”
4“You will not surely die,” the serpent told the woman. 5“For God knows that in the day you eat of it, your eyes will be opened and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”
6When the woman saw that the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eyes, and that it was desirable for obtaining wisdom, she took the fruit and ate it. She also gave some to her husband who was with her, and he ate it.
7And the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked; so they sewed together fig leaves and made coverings for themselves.
God holds Adam ,not Eve responsible.
Romans 5: 12 Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned— Through a man (Adam), not Eve.
Another translation is more pointed:
"When Adam sinned, sin entered the world. Adam’s sin brought death, so death spread to everyone, for everyone sinned."
Eve did not disobey Adam...he never gave her a loving and saving directive "No Eve! that will kill us, let's get out of here!". So, in my book Adam sinned first because of dereliction of duty. It was his duty to protect Eve and he didn't and as a result, sin, which brought death, brought death to the entire world....but, Jesus has reversed all that for those who believe in him.
😊 Read it many times. Since a child to old age. And to my children. And had wonderful Godly teachers. Yes Adam is most responsible and responsible to guide and protect her. I understand your point. Yet Eve can't blame him, cant shift the blame so to speak. She is also responsible to God and to obey Him. Directly accountable to God. As are all women. And are all men.
Yes, we are all guilty before God - and can't earn anything since anything that comes out of us is tainted by our innate sin. So thankful that Jesus died for what WE've done so we could be in his arms again! Have a blessed Sunday.
Sorry but that is confusion.Adam was made. Created by God. A man.
JESUS was and is and will always be God. A HOLY God. He was never Adam.
God sent Him to earth once as a Holy Babe. And He died for us. To save us from our sins. If we repent. And He was raised again. And went back to Heaven. God the Father. God the Son and God the Holy Spirit. The Triune God
Luckily, this article is from an open-source journal, so it's easily verified that, no, in fact, nothing of the kind was found by Malanga & Biondi. Hope this helps.
Different pyramid, this was their old research of the Khnum-Khufu Pyramid, the video refers to a recent press release from 15.03.2025. I guess if the claims are true they haven't released that study yet.
So much we don't know, so much has been hidden from us. Thank you for informing us once again Greg!
So much we don't know is right!
I have no doubt that the Pharaohs (who had the elongated skull) were the Nephilim of the Bible. Their size in the many reliefs is hard to miss compared to that of people. I also have no doubt that they are the ones who constructed all the HUGE sized statues, temples and pyramids. It does not surprise me, but only confirms my belief that they were extremely technological species before their time.
Unfortunately this post claims there to be a march 15th press release, but that does not exist anywhere on the internet, only the study from 2022 showing readings above ground inside the pyramid. This story is fake and misleading, please try to find more evidence before hasty belief.
I've also been unable to find any links to the supposed March 15th press release. I just find the same statement repeated across various third party accounts of this press release, but no link to the actual release. Seems very suspiciously like this whole notion of a March 15th report (and all that's claimed to be in it) is inaccurate, perhaps totally fictional, information.
At the end of the research paper, it states:
"Note: this abstract is released exclusively for journalists interested in attending the press conference on March 16, 2025, where these discoveries will be extensively discussed and presented with supporting evidence."
I used Grok to do some deep diving, it took a bit, but found that, indeed, a conference did occur involving Corrado Malanga, Filippo Biondi, and Armando Mei on March 15, 2025, in Bologna, Italy, at the Hotel Castello Artemide Congressi, titled "Giza, Le Piramidi e la Porta del Tempo." This event, organized by Archeoares, matches the description of the press conference mentioned in the image, where the researchers discussed their SAR findings beneath the Khafre Pyramid. Hope this helps
https://www.youtube.com/embed/NuL3Fv-x3so?si=aDUebnQ_yaOJUfu4&start=0&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR3XoJcxrwlNUICWdy8GwU7uxEhrvq6zkZwhDjzNZalQXswv_Z7hmtcg7kY_aem_Se9heCdgk_gr-IE-9cMtBQ
All that says is there will be a press release on March 15. It never happened.
Thanks for sharing this. I appreciate it.
I had come across that video and from my perspective, it adds no further credibility to the claims. If anything, I find it only detracts from the possibility that this story is factual.
Yeah… a “news” source from Pakistan and “press releases” via Facebook and YouTube are not exactly compelling. The link to a Nature article was promising, but it is not about the same topic… so… yeah, calling this one Bullshit.
Agreed.
Mark Rockeymoore and many other similar accounts are just promoting series of 'self-claimed documentaries' that all leads to a Bible sale via same Amazon Store, nice PR.
After further investigation, prompted by yesterday's release of the official Italian press release video, I've written up my findings on my SubStack: https://jonathanevatt.substack.com/p/the-khafre-revelation-whats-really
This includes a full translation of the press release transcript, for those who don't speak Italian.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-91115-8
Thank you Heather. That was the only reputable and time/date relevant reference/source I've seen on this matter. Although, as far as I can tell, it has no images or findings along the lines of what the social media hype (and @gregreese etc.) has shared on this story.
It's nothing but a hoax -and diversion. To make us look another way, and don't see what's really important.
Thanks for your input "Liz" / @pyramidhoax
I am very intrigued that you appear to have set up a SubStack account solely for posting this comment, and for dismissing this story as a "diversion"? I'd love to hear more about what you feel is the "really important" information this story is diverting people from?
“Trevor grassi” YouTube page has the info, he is the one who broke the story (unintentionally lol) Currently waiting for their super long presentation and paper for proofs. I wasn’t aware SAR could go that deep but it is dry sand and bed rock so that helps. There is a lot of circumstantial evidence to support this claim and the disappointing behavior of the Egypt government lends credibility to the statement.
Edit: yes I made an account just to post this one comment cause of all the hate in comments lol. Btw when searching this subject you need to use DuckDuckGo browser as the page would not show up in YouTube, same issue with “Richard Gabriel” YT page, never seen that happen before.
Here is the source of the new images:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/12EafG8WB4a/
Facebook is poison. Please find alternative places and many of us cannot go to his hell.
"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the NY Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings, and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop OUR PLAN for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a World Government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual ELITE and World Bankers is surely preferable to the national auto - determination practiced in past centuries." - David Rockefeller CFR Kingpin, Founder of the Trilateral Commission, NWO Godfather / June 1991
The one world government has always existed. The UN/IMF is the One World Government.
In 1302 Pope Boniface XIII stated he was the Godhead of Earth and to this day the Vatican still controls everything. They are the owners of all countries and they believe they own your Soul.
https://telegra.ph/Unam-Sanctam-The-1st-Trust-of-the-world-06-30
The above refers to the Original Trust but every 150 years or so it has been updated.
Cestui Que Vie Trust 1666 as well as many prior are evidence it is active. The document below shows it has been updated as of 2010 as well.
https://tinyurl.com/CestuiQ
This is FDRs official end of the Republic. https://tinyurl.com/FDRaa
https://tinyurl.com/OwnsYou98
Commerce is all there is https://tinyurl.com/CourtNo
Y
"J F .K. Secret Society Speech" 4.21. 61 ... "For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed."
Why deception? Because anything leading you back to your Creator MUST be suppressed by the Luciferians.
"The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists." -- J. Edgar Hoover, FBI Director (America is faced with SEVERAL monstrous conspiracies and they are NOT "theories.")
"We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the world - no longer a Government of free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men."- Woodrow Wilson
Who do you think controls info? You?
We are programmed to reject truth, just as William Casey, CIA Director desired when he made the statement, "We will know our project is a success when everything the American People believe is false" The CIA has staff operatives in every major "NEWS" outlet. It's an Intelligence game going on for the uber Elite since "Project Paperclip" in 1947.
I think when a scientist wants to claim a finding is true and backed by evidence they need to publish their experiments and have it confirmed and peer-reviewed by other researchers. This could very well be real, but the lack of publishing their methodology speaks for itself for the time being. To be so contrarian to reject "NEWS" outlets, but believe youtubers. "When everything the american people believe is false." I think it worked on you bud.
The paper is out there if you look.
Redpillproject on rumble episode “ the world is a stage “ talks about it, as well.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/NuL3Fv-x3so?si=aDUebnQ_yaOJUfu4&start=0&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR3XoJcxrwlNUICWdy8GwU7uxEhrvq6zkZwhDjzNZalQXswv_Z7hmtcg7kY_aem_Se9heCdgk_gr-IE-9cMtBQ
"Bible" you know, get humanity’s greatest fanfiction the fk out of here
If you think it is fiction… you have the biggest shock of your life coming soon. Do your own deep research and then comment.
‘Deep research’, what a laugh, the cry of the wilfully ignorant conspiracist!
Happy to supply you with the uncountable resourses that I have. This has been my life’s work.
Like what?
The issue is not quantity, the issue is that these all tend to be self referencing nonsense, with no credible or verifiable merit…there is nothing ‘deep’ about any of it.
Everyone is going to get "shocked"
The disease of lies & deception has spread into everything over more centuries that your are even aware that exists
Hi! I hope you're having a great day and I don't mean to sound condescending, but I do want you to consider that deep research doesn't really solidify the truth of the Bible unless you're only researching facts that support your narrative. Actually the bibles creation came from the need to exert power over a community of people, much like many other religions do. I will admit that it's curious that the story of Jesus so closely aligns with the story of Siddhartha Gautama (the Buddha) and they both emerged around the same time period in two totally separate parts of the world in a time where technology wasn't advanced enough to communicate globally. While this information does not work to discredit or prove anything, it's a simple "now you know". It's interesting the parallels in origin stories, especially considering they took two different paths after. There are so many similarities across all religions that its silly to say someone should research more when they themselves have only researched their own. Just something to consider and maybe look into if you're feeling open-minded. Have a great Thursday!
Sorry to tell you Kelsey, but what you just wrote would have every Jew laughing or swearing at you. The Old Testament is called the Hebrew Scriptures, because it is their history, both spiritually and civically. The OT alone takes up a bit more than 1/2 the Bible. The NT was written by eyewitness of Jesus - the apostles, except one Luke who was not Jewish and Paul, who wasn't an eye witness. What do you suppose caused these men to spread the gospel with such determination after having seen Jesus crucified to bits? It was his resurrection. Once they saw that, they needed to see nothing more. Since that early beginning, Christianity has changed the globe. No other religion can make a claim like this. Buddha never claimed to be God. Jesus did. Buddah never suffered a horrible death to save his followers. Jesus did. Buddha was not recorded as healing the blind, raising the dead, feeding 5K people, etc. Jesus was. There is no comparison. The flood story is found in many cultures, because it happened. It was a global event that will never be forgotten. Only a small group of people at the time knew that It came from Yahweh. The others had no knowledge outside of 'animal gods', etc., so they have different names for the one who sent it, but the fact that it is found every where is undeniable evidence that it happened. I hope you do a lot more research. Your's is woefully lacking. See "Evidence that Demands a Verdict" for actual evidence as to the truth of the Bible. I think the man who wrote it was a lawyer and put this together like a case.
Beautiful. Jesus is the ONLY one who can save us. The Only God who loves sinners. We need to repent and walk in His ways. And focus on His life.
God is the One who made the earth and us. And even the people who made pyramids. 😀
I am very aware of your reasonings to think this way. However, my research goes WAY beyond the bible.
I'd be game to see some of your resources, if you're open to sharing.
Me three! 🙋🏼♀️
Me too! 🙋♂️
Nikola Tesla, the acknowledged Smartest Man In The World, said that after a lifetime of spiritual study of all the religions, spiritual teachings, theosophies, and philosophies, the one that facilitates the greatest connection to God, is Buddhism.
Thanks to the bible we found and odemtofoed a lot of archeological places such as Niniveh, Babylon and Edom.
Archaeology didn’t need the Bible to find these sites.
Nineveh was identified in the mid-1800s by archaeologists like Austen Henry Layard, using Assyrian records, cuneiform tablets, and local tradition — not the Bible.
Babylon was known long before biblical archaeology even began. The site was never “lost” — it was a well-known ruin near modern Hillah, Iraq. Excavations began in earnest under Robert Koldewey in the late 1800s.
Edom (in southern Jordan) was located and studied using geography, ancient trade routes, and inscriptions — again, the Bible was not the key source.
Yes, the Bible mentions real places, but so do Homer’s epics and Gilgamesh. That doesn’t make every story they tell historically accurate. The Bible is a blend of myth, legend, theology, and history — like many ancient texts. Using it to corroborate the existence of cities is fine, but using it to prove supernatural claims (e.g. miracles, global floods, talking snakes) is not archaeology — it’s apologetics.
Many archaeologists study the ancient Near East in the context of the Bible — but they do so critically, not as believers trying to “prove the Bible.”
In fact, archaeology has dis-proven or cast doubt on many biblical claims:
No evidence for a global flood
No evidence for the Exodus as described
No archaeological support for the conquest of Canaan as told in Joshua
Just because the Bible mentions real places doesn’t make its spiritual claims or miraculous stories historically valid. We didn’t need divine inspiration to locate Nineveh — we needed science, linguistics, and a lot of digging.
According to the archeologist, they did. That does not make the Bible "true", but it's not hard fetched to claim at least some of its geography is useful for historical purposes.
On the Conquest of Canaan, it depends if you consider the Habiru as hebrews or not. My theory is that they are one tribe or people who later merged with Hebrews, so not really like in the bible but it has some historicity.
Look up the book "Evidence that Demands a Verdict" - if you actually care.
Religion in big 2025 🤣🤣🤣
I will debunk this book for you, here we go!
A lot of the “evidence” relies on assuming the Bible is already true to prove that the Bible is true.
Example: “Jesus must have risen because the Bible says so, and we know the Bible is reliable because it says so.”
The book selectively quotes ancient historians (like Josephus or Tacitus) as “proof” of Jesus’ life and resurrection.
These sources mention Jesus, but do not confirm supernatural claims.
Scholars (including Christian ones) acknowledge that miracles aren’t something history can verify.
The book often presents straw man arguments against atheism, Islam, or secularism.
It doesn’t engage with academic counterarguments in good faith — it’s preaching to the choir, not convincing skeptics.
While influential in evangelical circles, many of its arguments have been refuted or weakened by modern biblical scholarship, archaeology, and philosophy.
It ignores or downplays contradictions in the Bible, the evolution of Christian doctrine, and evidence of myth-making in early Christianity.
Bart Ehrman (agnostic NT scholar): Points out that the Gospels were written decades after Jesus’ death, and are not eyewitness reports.
Richard Carrier (historian): Argues that many apologetic claims are based on flawed historical methodology.
Even some Christian scholars have said McDowell oversells the certainty of his conclusions.
This book might affirm beliefs for Christians, but it’s nowhere near convincing for skeptics, historians, or scholars who apply rigorous standards of evidence.
So yeah — if you “actually care,” you’ll probably want to read real academic work on the subject, not just a 1970s evangelical handbook dressed up as courtroom drama.
Hi William, There is so much information out there supporting the truth of the Bible and of Jesus, that I find it hard to believe a real researcher could not find and read this material. In fact, the person who influenced me about Jesus was an atheist who set out to prove that Jesus was not true, and couldn't do it and became a Christian, instead. I could spend time sending you to articles, etc., but my experience with people who say the same things as you have is that intuitively, they know Jesus is God and they don't want to submit to him and bow their knee to him as King. They don't want anyone to be 'God over them" and so they fight what they really know is (probably) true. There is a lot of academic work by unbelievers - agnostics (which you cited), etc. The Apostles were eyewitnesses and there are 4 accounts - 1 from each of them, because they all come from different angles. The OT really can't be refuted as Jews have it as their own Scriptures even to this day. Doubt that? Talk to a rabbi. God has a claim on our lives, because he created us. You can't get around it. His plan is to have all those who believe in him and submit to him as Lord, join him in heaven and on the new heaven and new earth (yes, we won't be in heaven forever). Those who refuse to will go to hell and this is for forever. Even before that happens, everyone will acknowledge that he is God. Make your choice. You can fight God, but you will never win. If you really have doubts, keep on digging and you'll arrive at the truth, if you want to.
"So much information out there supporting the truth of the Bible and Jesus..."
There is a lot of information, yes — but the quality and credibility of that information matters.
Much of what people cite as “proof” (books like Evidence That Demands a Verdict, Case for Christ, etc.) are written by believers for believers, not by neutral historians or scholars.
"The person who influenced me was an atheist who set out to disprove Jesus..."
Are you referring to Lee Strobel? Author of "The Case for Christ"? If so Strobel was a journalist who converted to Christianity and wrote books defending it. But his "atheist turned Christian" narrative is personal testimony, not objective evidence. Many people convert in all directions — it's not proof of truth, just anecdotal.
"People reject Jesus because they don’t want to submit to him"
This is a psychological argument, not a logical or evidentiary one. It assumes nonbelievers are secretly convinced but rebellious — which is both condescending and inaccurate. Many people reject Christianity because they genuinely don’t find sufficient evidence, or because other worldviews make more sense to them.
"There’s a lot of academic work by unbelievers, agnostics, etc."
True: Scholars like Bart Ehrman (agnostic), Richard Carrier (atheist), John Dominic Crossan (liberal Christian) have studied the Bible critically. But they often disagree strongly with evangelical interpretations. Ehrman, for example, says the Bible is full of contradictions, was not written by eyewitnesses, and contains later legendary additions (e.g. the resurrection appearances).
"The Apostles were eyewitnesses and there are 4 accounts..."
The 4 Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, John) were not written by eyewitnesses, according to most mainstream scholars. They were written decades after Jesus's death, in Greek, by unknown authors. They also contradict each other on key details (e.g., Jesus's genealogy, resurrection timeline, who visited the tomb).
"The OT can’t be refuted — talk to a rabbi"
The Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) is sacred in Judaism, but Jews do not accept Christian interpretations of messianic prophecy. They don’t believe Jesus fulfilled the messianic criteria (e.g., rebuilding the temple, bringing world peace). Christian readings of the OT (like Isaiah 53 being about Jesus) are retrospective reinterpretations, not universally accepted truths.
"God has a claim on your life... choose now or go to hell"
This is theological belief, not evidence-based argument. Eternal damnation is part of Christian doctrine, but not accepted by other religions or secular ethics. Saying “you’ll go to hell if you don’t believe” is emotional coercion, not a rational argument.
Here's your reality check!
There is no independent, contemporary evidence for the resurrection of Jesus. The Gospels are religious texts, not objective biographies. Christianity is not the only religion with devoted followers, personal testimonies, and sacred texts. Hell, salvation, and divine authority are faith claims, not universal facts.
The apostles absolutely were eyewitnesses even if they wrote their accounts later. These so-called scholars do not have the Holy Spirit and without him you can't even understand what the Bible is saying. Look up people who were atheists and aren't anymore. I'm not going to do your research for you. Seems to me you have spent all your time in one camp. Do you know the history of this area of 'scholarly' research? Many years ago, these heresies crept in and these people went on to become the scholars you cite. Try searching out other material that will give you a more balanced view. I get tired of educating people like you who don't really care anyway - your mind is made up. Many people DO reject Jesus because they don't want to submit to him - they've told me so. Maybe that isn't true of you, but it is true of many people. Contradictions appear to be so, but aren't. Yes, they were eyewitnesses, that's a lie. Luke's gospel in the very beginning says he has read various manuscripts of which there are many, and he carefully writes this letter to Theophilus who needs to know if what he believes is true. Have you read the Gospels, Matt, Mark, Luke and John and asked God to show you if Jesus is true? Do that and see if things change for you. If you are bound to not believe, I can't help. We know a Jewish man who told us that he called out to God and asked him if Jesus really is the Messiah - and if so, to give him a sign. He was afterward struck by lightening. He didn't think that was the sign. So, he was struck a second time with lightening and he still didn't think he was getting a sign. We know him personally and he told us this story. What can I say. If you really want to know, seek him, because he says "Seek me and you will find me". All the evidence in the world cannot convince you like a personal encounter with Jesus.
To make a comment it
Obviously you have never actually read it !!
It's quite easy to utterly dismiss something you know nothing about.
Tony, I get it — "You haven't read it" is the go-to defense when someone critiques your favorite book. But I have read it — and more importantly, I've read the scholarship that interacts with it.
The issue isn't that "Evidence That Demands a Verdict" exists. It's that it's not actual evidence — it's apologetics. There's a difference between presenting arguments meant to persuade believers, and offering subjective, peer-reviewed historical analysis.
If you think quoting the Bible to prove the Bible is valid historical reasoning, that's the problem I'm pointing out — not ignoring.
Also, dismissing my critique by assuming ignorance instead of engaging with the points I made (like the authorship of the Gospels, lack of contemporary source, or theological circularity) is a classic dodge. You're not defending the content — you're just gatekeeping it.
I'm not dismissing something "I know nothing about." I'm dismissing something I know enough about to recognize as ideologically motivated and methodologically flawed.
But hey — if you've got actual evidence outside of faith-based testimonials and internal biblical claims, I'm always open to see it.
You are spot on. Makes so much sense, particularly after you see the extraordinary HUGE beds in the Egyptian museum. Like what the F!!! Only a GIANT would need furniture as that !
Have you seen their swords???? Unbelievable. I'll see if I can find the picture of it, excavated. Unbelievable. The Bible also references a giant in the Bible and gives the size of his bed, too.
Deut. 3: 11 (King Og of Bashan was the last survivor of the giant Rephaites. His bed was made of iron and was more than thirteen feet long and six feet wide. It can still be seen in the Ammonite city of Rabbah.)
https://news.artnet.com/art-world/large-ceremonial-dako-sword-discovered-in-japan-2267998.
Thank you for this research. I know the Rothschilds must correspond with the demons and they want us dead. Hence the injections brought forth 🇨🇦
Your Rothschilds sentence is pure, high-octane conspiratorial nonsense.
The Rothschilds are a Jewish banking family who’ve been targeted by antisemitic conspiracy theories for centuries.
“Demons” = classic religious paranoia sprinkled in for spice.
This is 100% tinfoil hat territory. No evidence. Just paranoia soup.
They funded both sides of the major wars since the 1700. They funded Hitler. They loaned money to the Holy-See . Bought the Vatican under their control . The Pope kissed the feet of the Rothschilds and Henry Kissinger. You need to do a tiny bit of research. The term conspiracy theory coined by the CIA owned by the Rothschilds who own 90% of the world's wealth. Amy country who would not take their " IMF loans" were bombed. Senator Ron Johnson said yesterday that the US was responsible for 911. You are so far behind in understanding how the world works. Sprinkled with a lot of ignorance here.
Oh wait you are correct there are a few more names. Get educated !House of Bernadotte, Sweden
House of Bourbon, France
House of Braganza, Portugal
House of Grimaldi, Monaco
House of Guelph, Britain (the most important one)
House of Habsburg, Austria
House of Hanover, Germany (the second most important one)
House of Hohenzollern, Germany
House of Karadjordjevic, Yugoslavia (former)
House of Liechtenstein, Liechtenstein
House of Nassau, Luxembourg
House of Oldenburg, Denmark
House of Orange, Netherlands
House of Savoy, Italy
House of Wettin, Belgium
House of Wittelsbach, Germany
House of Württemberg, Germany
House of Zogu, Albania
All the families you will find on the Windsor family tree. (Queen Mum)
Also:
House Of Aldobrandini
House Of Borja
House Of Breakspeare
House Of Chigi
House Of Colonna
House Of Conti
House Of Este
House Of Farnese
House Of Gaetoni
House Of Medici
House Of Orsini
House Of Pamphili
House Of Somaglia
“They funded both sides of every war since 1700”.
Source? Your ass.
There is zero credible evidence that the Rothschild family funded “both sides of every war.” That’s a myth straight out of 19th-century antisemitic propaganda. This claim was popularized by fake quotes, forged documents, and Nazi-era disinformation. The Rothschilds were successful bankers — not war-summoning puppetmasters from a Bond film. If you think funding both sides of a war is a smart business model, congrats — you’ve never read a single actual history book.
“They funded Hitler.”
Let’s get this straight:
You’re saying a Jewish banking family funded Adolf fucking Hitler?
- That’s so historically illiterate it’s offensive.
- The Nazis blamed the Rothschilds, seized their assets, and forced them to flee Europe.
- They were explicitly targeted by Nazi racial laws.
- Saying the Rothschilds funded Hitler is like saying Anne Frank funded the Gestapo.
“They bought the Vatican. The Pope kissed their feet.”
Holy Dan Brown, Batman. Where’s your next claim — that the Freemasons cloned Jesus in a Denver airport bunker?
The Vatican has never been “bought” by anyone.
Popes have kissed the feet of many in symbolic gestures — not because they were owned.
This is religious conspiracy LARPing, not history.
“The CIA invented the term ‘conspiracy theory’ to protect the Rothschilds.”
100% false.
The term “conspiracy theory” dates back to the 19th century — long before the CIA existed.
The claim that the CIA invented it in 1967 is a misinterpretation of a declassified memo about JFK disinformation — not proof of a Rothschild coverup.
This is conspiracy inception: a conspiracy about the word “conspiracy.”
“They own 90% of the world’s wealth.”
Nope. That’s not even remotely true.
The Rothschilds are wealthy, sure, but they’re not even on Forbes’ top 100 billionaires anymore.
The idea that one family controls 90% of global wealth is mathematically insane and economically impossible.
If you believe that, you don’t understand how money, markets, or math work.
“Here's a giant list of royal families. Get educated!”
Wow. You found a list of European aristocracy on Wikipedia. Congratulations on learning to copy and paste.
Guess what? Most of these families are ceremonial relics with no real power.
Britain’s monarchy doesn’t run the world. Neither does Monaco’s.
Listing royal houses doesn’t prove a conspiracy — it proves you like typing names.
You could list every family in Game of Thrones and it would have the same evidentiary weight.
Read a book. Learn real history. Stop embarrassing yourself.
This sword is 7.5 feet long, found in a 4th-century Japanese tomb. It’s ceremonial, not functional. No one was swinging this around unless they were Godzilla with biceps. Ancient cultures made oversized weapons for ritual, burial, or symbolic reasons, not for battle.
Deuteronomy 3:11
"Og king of Bashan... his bed was made of iron and was more than thirteen feet long and six feet wide."
Yes, the Bible says that. But ancient texts are full of legendary exaggerations. Just like Goliath being over 9 feet tall — these are mythic elements, not historical measurements. The bed might have been symbolic, royal, or even a mistranslation. No archaeological evidence of Og or his bed has been found.
Man, the people in these comments are really uninformed. I got you though!
The Large beds or thrones found in museums (like Tutankhamun’s funeral bed) are often symbolic, ceremonial, or designed for status, not practical sleeping. Egyptian furniture was sometimes oversized for ritual, burial, or royal reasons, not because anyone was 15 feet tall. These beds were found in **tombs**, not bedrooms — they were spiritual props for the afterlife.
If we had only that post to rely on for proof, we'd be in trouble. Thankfully, there is a ton of information on this pyramid phenomenon and what it's all about is still being discovered. However, the preciseness of the stones at that time would have been impossible without extra knowledge and strength coming from somewhere. Consider the evidence and draw your own conclusions, but I think the feats of architecture, combined with the available tools and knowhow, combined with the reliefs that show gigantic individuals wearing headdresses to cover their elongated skulls, combined with museums showing the same skulls, combined with other evidence gives a pretty good case for 'other than human' intervention. And, remember that I'm not the one who made the post, I only agreed with it. No one should ever think we know all. Though it's not my wheelhouse, there are a lot of people who dig and study, think and research and keep doing so. These are people with advanced degrees in what they do. Much of what is 'out there' has been buried for some reason, I don't know why. But, there are secrets all around us that intrigue human beings. When they are discovered, we often find that we were already told about them in Scripture.
On Ancient structures built with precision:
https://www.thearchaeologist.org/blog/360-travel-inside-the-great-pyramid-of-giza
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RoRCbaMJBg; https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=eDy8SaPVN48; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neOHDmmYFdk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugdjZeanOOs; https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=QE46fGzZTog; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87a9-wgkCaQ
On Skulls:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnB2DwCyuvw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KEg_1s-eKQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsHvbOUBfkw
On Giants:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2MrTgBoqiI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TM6jCmO4SJM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbljB5l9kCE
Gog and Magog in the Bible - giant statues in Britain
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYP8QtSG5-8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnLyN_6gnto This is the reason for the flood.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPWti8JffVg&t=8s Pharoahs still matter today.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUBaoimj9vM
Ok, William. I see that all your responses to me are of the same ilk: prove it. So, let's just part ways. Spirituality is a thing of faith. Not everything can be proven. Prove there is love in your heart. No, you can't. You live in one dimension - your physical senses and your logic. It doesn't address things you can't see or touch. See and touch a demon or evil for me? You can't do it, so according to you: it doesn't exist. You weary me. Goodbye.
I believe that we are the ones so say behind. If you look at the free electricity from the 1800's brought down through the aether and run along the ground you know this knowledge was hidden. It's only know that we find out that the CIA has reversed engineered the space ships and been using them since the 1940's at taxpayers expenses. I would assume that the Rothschild's with their elongated skulls have all this information tucked away in the Vatican. 🇨🇦
Our DOD has been working with 'aliens' demons for quite a while. I have read an article and seen a video by a whistleblower about it - that's why we're the leader in weaponry.
Rebecca, you truly are a specimen to be studied.
“Our DOD has been working with 'aliens' demons for quite a while... that's why we're the leader in weaponry.”
The idea that the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) is working with aliens or demons is absurd and unsupported by any credible evidence. There are no verifiable documents, no confirmed eyewitnesses, and no physical proof. Claims like this often cite anonymous sources, YouTube videos, or articles on fringe websites — not peer-reviewed science or verified intel leaks.
Many conspiracy theorists — especially from fundamentalist Christian backgrounds — reframe aliens as demonic entities. This is not based on science, astronomy, theology, or military records — it's just personal belief. Aliens = demons is a faith-based interpretation, not a testable theory.
The U.S. leads in military tech because of:
Massive defense budgets (e.g. $800+ billion/year)
Advanced R&D in aerospace, AI, cyber warfare
Global military-industrial complex
Long-term investment in DARPA, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, etc.
Sorry, but this comes from interviews of ex military men who were there.
“This comes from interviews of ex-military men who were there.”
That’s not proof, that’s just hearsay — anecdotes without verification.
Anyone can claim anything in an interview — especially on platforms like YouTube, Rumble, or fringe Substacks, where there’s no fact-checking, peer review, or accountability.
If someone said they fought aliens with a lightsaber in Area 51, would you believe that too?
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Not a guy in night vision goggles saying “trust me, bro.”
There are zero declassified documents, no biometric data, no radar logs, no photographs, and no verifiable chain of custody for anything involving “alien demons” working with the DoD.
This is a misinterpretation of Nikola Tesla’s work. Tesla explored wireless transmission of electricity and theorized about the “aether” as a medium — a concept that was debunked by modern physics (especially after Einstein). The idea of “free energy” or “over-unity devices” is a pseudoscientific myth which violates the laws of thermodynamics.
**There is no evidence that free energy tech existed, let alone that it was suppressed.**
The aether isn't real, and free electricity didn’t exist in the 1800s. Tesla was brilliant, but not a magician.
"CIA has reverse engineered the space ships since the 1940s..."
There is no credible evidence that the CIA (or any agency) has reverse-engineered alien spacecraft. The U.S. government has studied UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) — but no proof of aliens. Declassified documents show interest in spy planes, not flying saucers.
"At taxpayers’ expense"
This part is almost accidentally true. Governments do waste money, but not on spacecraft reverse engineering. Classic conspiracy populism: "They're using your money to hide the truth!"
"Tucked away in the Vatican"
The Vatican is often invoked in conspiracy theories as a secret knowledge vault. Yes, the Vatican Library is private — but millions of documents are religious, historical, or administrative, not secret UFO files. Nothing credible links the Vatican to alien tech suppression.
This is not just wrong. It's a greatest-hits playlist of fringe internet theories.
It also confirms the Holy Bible as well.
If you have "no doubt" you are already subverted.
It's a commonly used phrase, not literally meant. I offer this modification "I have little doubt" and that does not come from what someone told me. I've been doing my own reading, watching, etc. of people more science oriented than I am - and those who do archeological digs, have museums of these enlongated skulls, etc. I have little doubt, based on my own analysis, not indoctrination.
Rebecca, Thank you for your well thought out comments! You are on the right track. I can always tell when someone has put in the time to do their own search. It is an individual journey for truth. Me must drown out the chatter of biased opinions and indoctrinated beliefs. I appreciate you & hope that others will do the same. It is not up to us(as individuals) to convince anyone else of what we have found. If these people care to find truth, they will start their journey for it. IF they do, they WILL find it. I truly hope that all will take that step, as it is more imminent than ever. I would suggest to start at the Heart of Jesus. Who was He? What did he Truly teach? I started by looking into the “Historical Jesus”. If we get to know Him & His authentic message for (ALL) of humanity, He will start leading us & reveal so much more. He knocks on the door of every heart. So many people lock it or slam it back in his face. Surrender what we “think” we already know, and watch life transform into Heaven, here & now! Heaven doesn’t have to wait…
I love this. Like me, and so many others, we WANT people to come to know Jesus. They don't understand now what we know they will understand with so much remorse, regret later, but there will be no way to help them then. I am glad people here have thoughtfully engaged, for the most part. We just need to pray that these seeds will germinate and that people will begin to seek Jesus, because our very lives depend on it. Thank you Heather.
Awesome video! I've been saying for decades, that the pyramids at Giza are power plants. They are antediluvian fallen angel structures....built by the nephilim. That's the truth that the Holy Spirit revealed to me...
Same here! I saw a video by a Christian scholar who said that we misunderstand the capabilities of angels, namely here, the evil, fallen angels who mated with women and produced 'the mighty men of old". He said that we think of them like we see on Valentine's cards, etc., but in truth, they are highly mathematical, technological creatures. This makes sense to me.
Hi, I'm not a biblical scholar and have not studied NT or OT. It seems like the nephilim are typically portrayed as "bad" or dangerous, part of the corruption and violence that led to divine judgment, and appear before the flood. I'm curious if you can speak more on this, and I'm curious if you see parallels between this and what we're experiencing today in the United States with respect to the tech industry and billionaires.
Hi Sarah, the Nephilim in the Bible are the result of the union between the fallen angels (demons, evil spirits) and women. They were evil and had human beings serving them and began eating them as food. Biblical scholars and archeologists who have dug them up believe they are the giants of old that the Bible refers to. The giants are mentioned off and on in the OT when Israel was trying to take land that God had given them. They once remarked "We are like grasshoppers to them". I thought that was metaphorical until I began to see proofs of giants, swords, beds, skeletons, etc. Britain who has giants in their history and Egypt both have statues of giants reflecting their knowledge of giants in their histories. Pyramids and ziggurat's were used for religious worship and at the top of them human sacrifice was practiced. Demons thrive from massacres of people. There is quite a bit of info out there, but it's scattered and has to be discovered and pieced together. It has been hidden, but is more and more coming out. The reason God sent the flood was to eradicate the Nephilim. He said that evil had become so great over the entire earth that it had to be wiped out and started over. Noah and his family's bloodline had not been contaminated with demonic DNA, so he was saved, with his family to begin the human line again - through which the blood of humans would be pure, eventually leading to Jesus himself. This is part of the spiritual war that has been going on since before creation. Those parts are recorded in Isaiah and Ezekiel, I believe. I'll put some articles here for you to read and investigate.
This article will give you the various views among theologians along with the various Scriptures. I adhere to the demonic/fallen angels one, because of the size of the skeletons that I've seen of giants....what would produce that? human + supernatural being = supersized evil being. https://www.gotquestions.org/Nephilim.html
There is more than one war in heaven in the Bible, but all of them are caused by Lucifer (his original name) or Satan (his name once he fell). It can be commonly seen in the Bible that God changes names of people based on significant life changes that change identity, essentially. (Abram - to Abraham, Sari to Sarah, etc.). Satan was originally named "Lucifer" = light bringer, but he lost that name when he fell from heaven (Jesus recalls "I saw Satan fall like Lightening from heaven). Anyway, I am putting a couple of articles here that talk about the wars of heaven.
https://biblechat.ai/knowledgebase/old-testament/major-prophets/who-described-ezekiel-281219/
This is a good article on Satan's fall - it was before creation.
https://www.compellingtruth.org/fall-of-Satan.html
Tech billionaires and most uber wealthy people (WEF, etc.) are building the one-world system where Satan will finally get to have the kingdom on earth that he has wanted. Some of them have been deceived into thinking that it will be for humanity's good, "we can make everybody be good". But, they themselves are not good, nor can humanity be forced to be as God gave all of us our being (being made in his image, we are autonomous and free, as he is). Satan will demand complete ownership of all on earth and worship of him. So, he is setting up - through the tech billionaires and others - a system where everyone can be tracked, traced, etc. and everyone will have to take a 'mark' - an electronically reactive 'mark' that will give them a digital file and continuously detail all they do. They are also looking at a way to wipe out the gene that recognizes God and responds to him - Satan wants to be god...can't be god when humans are aware of the real God. He will set up an 'image' of himself and everyone must bow down wherever they are when the image appears. I think it will be a hologram, which are amazingly realistic. The book of Daniel previews an event like this before the king - and they would not bow down. A hologram will allow this to appear anywhere on earth simultaneously. They are advancing this system at high speed - Trump appointed 3 men to work on this system 2 days into his term. I don't know how many Christians realized this. Many did. We know where this will lead. BUT, God is the ultimate gatekeeper and this will only happen in God's timing according to his plan. Babylon was the first attempt on earth, and you know how long ago that was - and they've been working at it ever since....so, time is short, but how short, we don't know.
https://davidicke.com/2025/01/25/stargate-trump-partners-with-technocrats-to-promote-mrna-injections-ai-and-transhumanism/
Sorry this was so long, but there is a ton of info on all this. Hope it was helpful.
I really appreciated this in depth response - with sources - to the question. One of the reasons I love Greg’s comment section. So many informed and erudite readers🙏✨🙏
Thank you! I love Greg Reese because his reports are so concise, packed with info in a short time. I enjoy the people here, too. I love learning from others. One person can't get around to everything, but between us sharing, we all come away with more info and understanding than we would on our own. I'm on a laptop, so I don't know how to get the emojis but have a prayerful and blessed day, too :)
Very good! I agree with what you've said here!
“The Nephilim in the Bible are the result of the union between the fallen angels and women... and began eating [humans] as food.”
What the Bible actually says (per GotQuestions):
Genesis 6:4 mentions the Nephilim as “heroes of old, men of renown.”
Theories about their origin include:
“Sons of God” = fallen angels who mated with women
OR “Sons of God” = powerful human rulers
There is no biblical support for the idea that the Nephilim ate humans.
The view that they were cannibalistic hybrid giants is from legends and conspiracy literature, not Scripture.
No biblical or archaeological evidence supports the claim that Nephilim ate humans. That’s myth, not theology.
“I began to see proofs of giants, swords, beds, skeletons, etc.”
Claims of giant skeletons have been repeatedly debunked.
Many photos of “giant skeletons” online are Photoshop hoaxes or misidentified archaeological finds.
The Smithsonian, National Geographic, and archaeologists do not recognize any evidence of human skeletons over 12 feet tall.
No verified “giant skeletons” exist. The idea is based on internet hoaxes and misinterpretation of burial artifacts.
“Satan fell before creation... Tech billionaires are building the one-world system for him.”
What Compelling Truth actually says:
Satan’s fall occurred before humanity was created (not before all of creation).
His rebellion was rooted in pride, not AI or surveillance.
The article discusses spiritual rebellion, not political or technological conspiracies.
The leap from biblical theology to tech billionaires as Satan’s agents is pure speculation — not biblical and not supported by the article YOU cited.
“Trump appointed 3 men to work on this system... everyone will take a mark... it’ll be a hologram image of Satan.”
Trump partnered with tech leaders (Sam Altman, Larry Ellison, etc.) to launch the Stargate Project, a massive AI infrastructure initiative.
The article wildly speculates that this is tied to transhumanism, mRNA tech, and global control — but it’s Icke’s conspiracy spin, not evidence-based journalism.
No mention of Satan, holograms, or biblical prophecy in the actual press releases or project documentation.
This is David Icke-level conspiracy theory, not fact. The project is about AI and data centers, not building the Antichrist’s kingdom.
“God sent the flood to eradicate the Nephilim... Noah’s bloodline wasn’t contaminated by demonic DNA.”
What GotQuestions says:
This theory is one interpretation — not a biblical certainty.
The Bible says God sent the flood because “every inclination of the thoughts of the human heart was only evil all the time” (Genesis 6:5).
The idea of “demonic DNA” is modern pseudoscience slapped onto ancient text — never mentioned in Scripture.
“Everyone will have to take a mark... I think it will be a hologram... appear anywhere on earth.”
The “Mark of the Beast” (Revelation 13) is symbolic or prophetic — interpretations vary widely.
There is no biblical mention of holograms or AI in the text.
The idea that modern tech fulfills prophecy is speculative theology, not supported by evidence or Scripture.
Rebecca. Your post is a blend of folklore, fringe theology, and full-blown conspiracy theory. YOU reference sources that don’t even say what YOU claim they say.
This isn’t theology — it’s apocalyptic fan fiction.
Yes, I side with the fallen angels, because something has to account for the humungous size of them and regular humans who are powerful rulers would not make their size any different than ordinary people.
This block of text makes 0 sense.
Was that Christian scholar Chuck Missler?
You know, I don't know who it was. I think it was someone more science/Bible based. Have no idea.
Maybe Dr. Michael Heiser.
Truly!
Genesis 1:1 earth was created & populated with life, by the Elohim FAMILY of GodS.
Fallen angels hijacked earth, taught men civilization skills, and built civilizations. THEY built the pyramids, monolithic structures, Nasca lines, etc. and ruled as gods (Enki, Enlil, Shiva, Vishnu, Viracocha, Quetzalcoatl, Osiris, etc.)
Genesis 1:2 earth BECAME a destroyed wasteland, as described in Jeremiah 4:23-28. Fallen angel civilizations destroyed and they went underground.
See “Ancient Apocalypse” on Netflix, 14 seasons of “Ancient Aliens”, (supported by 2 Peter 3:5-6 & Isaiah 24:1, Ecclesiastes 1:9, Ezekiel chapter 31).
The phrase “without form, and void” is only used twice in the Bible, and I believe they are describing the same event - destruction of “the old world” mentioned in the Bible. It is NOT USED to describe Noah’s Flood (which was REGIONAL).
THE PYRAMIDS OF GIZA AND THE COMING POLE SHIFT THE MESSAGE IN PLAIN SIGHT WATCH TILL THE END
https://old.bitchute.com/video/geBzPs8GRHep/
See “36,400 BC: The Historical time of the Zep Tepi Theory” that explains The origins of Giza pyramids & their star alignments. EXCELLENT research!!
https://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-africa/36400-bc-historical-time-zep-tepi-theory-002617
Genesis 1:3 earth is REPLENISHED by the Elohim FAMILY.
Here is a good article on the Elohim, as I wrote below that I don't think you have it right. This website is very sound, so I looked the question up and I thought their answer was very good. https://www.gotquestions.org/meaning-of-Elohim.html
The problem with a lot of materials out there is that they are written by people who are not born again - they are scholars looking at the Bible, etc. or they are Christianized, but they are not born again (with the HS) and that makes all the difference.
A couple of things... Elohim....don't know that you have it right. We are not really told who they are and there is much speculation. I am now hearing the heresy that Yahweh was only one of the Elohim, not the ultimate GOD, which is heresy through and through. I have to do some research on this word in Hebrew and find out more. God does not mention anything about the Elohim being on earth when he created Adam and Eve. I have to read more on this. Also - the flood was not at all regional - it was global in nature...where did you get this idea? Just curious. I don't think we can assume there was an 'old world' and the one we are currently in. We touched on that in seminary, but I can't remember much about it, only that it was speculative, at best.
Please help me understand your viewpoint. You believe that Satan and Elohims has deceived the whole world right? But you call heresy the thought that the Hebrew god is not the ultimate god because HE said that he is the real god? How do you know his true purpose, his true identity? Ive read that Corrando Malanga, one of the guys on this pyramid research who is studying alien abductions believes that gods of all cultures were aliens. He says they want our souls to achieve immortality and religion makes it easier to willingly transfer. This makes much more sense too me, the Hebrew god to be just another deceiver while the ultimate god isnt really bothered with his creation, and that is if he exists.
In terms of your question: I have yet to determine what I think about the Elohim, but Satan is definitely evil and his angels (fallen angels, demons - which I believe ARE aliens) feast off humanity in many ways. YES, they want our souls. I didn't know why, but I think he is probably right - to achieve immortality.
This article is a good rundown of how Satan, who was originally named "Lucifer" fell from heaven and became 'the devil' or Satan. He is also known and worshipped under those labels as well as others, such as Beelzebub. His fall was due to him arranging a coup to take God's throne - 1/3 of the angels (we're told there are myriads and myriads) went in on it with him - these are the aliens that live among the planets and falsify religions to draw people to himself through several avenues.
https://www.compellingtruth.org/fall-of-Satan.html
I have always believed that Almighty God is the God of the Bible and was brought up in a family who also believed, so we were into our Bibles from infancy, really since we were Baptist Protestant (they believe we should know the entire Bible). We attended church throughout my growing up and I went to Christian high school as well, finally totally receiving Jesus as my Savior in college. Throughout that time, I experienced him in many comforting and helpful ways. When we receive Jesus as our Savior, the Holy Spirit comes into us to mark us as Jesus's and our nature begins to change to desire what God desires and to become like Jesus.
The reason I believe (know) that Jesus is God (and Yahweh is his Father - though the Trinity is ONE God) is because of the changes he makes in people's lives and the ministry of the Holy Spirit that I have experienced and as I see others experience. I have not seen this with any other religion.
Other cultures with other gods remain in poverty, with poor hygiene/health knowledge, draconian religious rules and leaders, harsh punishments, rule keeping, etc. Christianity came out of cultures like that - originating in the OT with Abraham who was called out of Babylon - a very pagan culture. Yahweh presented a whole new way of living to his people (the Israelites), including dietary laws, etc. (down to that level). The Christian God (Yahweh, Jesus and the Holy Spirit) transforms us and transforms people and cultures who accept him as their God. The rules in the OT that people think are insane were training for these new people who had to be trained away from pagan religions (at the time they required human sacrifice, orgies, etc. - very dark) and he trained them in His ways - the opposite ways. In these pagan cultures when people become Christians, they change into new people entirely for the better and remain changed even though they live in the midst of a culture that has not changed. So, it's the proof I've seen in my own life, in other's lives, knowing the Bible well, etc. and no other God has offered eternal life to people by dying for them (Jesus is God). The gods of pagan religions require people to die for them, or injure themselves or others for their benefit. God would never think of such a thing. Since we were made in God's image, we too understand that this is evil. So, it's a combination of things that makes me believe that Yahweh is God.
Sounds like two sides of same coin. Good deceiver/bad deceiver. Feelings is not knowledge. I dont think you are thinking this all the way deep due to being grown to it, i understand it can be very hard to escape but you should try.
I appreciate your thinking, but I didn't believe until I was in college! So, I definitely didn't accept any grooming :). Where do you think I'm not thinking this deeply?
Yes! Thanks for this comment. I've heard this called the "Gap Theory"
"Genesis 1:1 earth was created & populated with life, by the Elohim FAMILY of GodS."
The Hebrew word “Elohim” is grammatically plural, but in context is almost always used as a singular title for the one true God of Israel — not a “family” of gods.
This is not the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Ancient Hebrew writers were monotheists, not polytheists or alien worshippers.
The idea that earth was "populated with life" before Genesis 1:2 is not in the text — it's a conspiracy theory known as the Gap Theory, which lacks biblical or scientific support.
"Fallen angels hijacked earth, built civilizations like the pyramids, Nasca lines, etc., and were worshipped as gods."
This is straight out of the TV show Ancient Aliens and has zero archaeological evidence. The pyramids were built by skilled Egyptian laborers using known techniques — no aliens, no demons, just geometry, labor, and time.
The Nasca lines? Created by the Nasca people using simple tools and surveying techniques.
Deities like Osiris, Shiva, and Quetzalcoatl are from entirely different cultures and timelines — lumping them all together as “fallen angels” is historical nonsense.
"Genesis 1:2 earth BECAME a destroyed wasteland... fallen angel civilizations destroyed it."
The “earth was without form and void” is a Hebrew poetic phrase (tohu wa-bohu) meaning chaotic and unformed, not post-apocalyptic.
Jeremiah 4:23–28 is not about Genesis — it’s a poetic prophecy of judgment on Judah, not a description of pre-Adamic destruction.
“Gap Theory” (that there was a world before Genesis 1:2) is not mainstream theology, and has no archaeological or scriptural backing.
"Watch ‘Ancient Apocalypse’ and ‘Ancient Aliens’ — it’s all supported by Bible verses."
These shows are entertainment, not scholarship. They rely on speculative claims, out-of-context quotes, and zero peer-reviewed evidence. Quoting 2 Peter 3, Isaiah, or Ecclesiastes doesn’t magically validate pseudoarchaeology. The Bible doesn’t support the idea of ancient aliens running Atlantis.
"The Zep Tepi Theory proves the pyramids are older than we think."
The Zep Tepi (“First Time”) is a mythological era in Egyptian texts — not a historical date. Claims that the pyramids date back to 36,000 BC are completely unsupported by radiocarbon dating, archaeological layers, or Egyptian chronology. The Great Pyramid was built around 2560 BCE, during the reign of Khufu, using local limestone, copper tools, and manpower — no mystery required.
“Zep Tepi” is myth, not alternate history.
"The Pyramids of Giza and the coming pole shift are connected!"
There's no evidence of an imminent pole shift that will destroy the world. Magnetic pole reversals are well understood, take thousands of years, and have no connection to pyramids or prophecies. “The message in plain sight” is usually code for “I’m making this up but it sounds cool.”
"Genesis 1:3 is earth being replenished after the destruction of the angel civilization."
Genesis 1:3 says: "And God said, 'Let there be light.'" That’s the beginning of creation, not a reboot of Atlantis. The idea that the world was “replenished” comes from KJV mistranslations and imaginative theology, not the actual Hebrew text.
Genesis 1 is not about rebuilding a demon-destroyed earth.
I've studied pyramid research for a very long time. And it has been clear that pyramids are machines. At this point, we still can't know what those machines were constructed for. But they are most certainly NOT tombs. They were most likely used for obtaining free energy. With all of the other information that has been discovered on the previous civilization of Grand Tartary, it becomes very clear that they used structures to draw energy from the aether and The Earth ... also think about "cathedrals." It is evident that The Tartarians had developed an amazingly advanced civilization. Of course, our evil usurpers, who have created their New World Order, also created the false history narrative called Scaligerian History. They have also erased much of our true history and destroyed most of those amazing buildings and structures.
Old World Order - 2024
Everyone here should check it out if you haven't.
What Persister is saying is spot on.
You won't be disappointed.
where can you watch this?
Either Rumble or YTube.
For Rumble... link below.
https://rumble.com/v4yawcr-live-world-premiere-old-world-order-everything-weve-been-told-is-a-lie.html
Which of the ideas shared on OWN did you find most compelling?
I can't say I was impressed by Old World Order (2024) at all. I say that as someone who has a life-long and active interest in discerning reality from fiction/belief, ancient knowledge, ancient history, mysticism, etc. From my perspective, most of what was conveyed in OWO was sadly laughable. I get that they're intentions are "good" but those who are deceived will always end up deceiving. In this case, those who are misguided are giving out misdirection.
The structures and buildings that they show, cannot be built by anyone today.
Architects themselves have no idea how they were built.
We see a similar story with the pyramids.
The buildings in the documentary have fake, made up historical narratives attached to them. Built within a year, during the days when we only had horse and buggy and still wiping our asses with our hands (according to the mainstream narrative) and before the invention of power tools.
It's silly. They are children stories for adults.
I personally don't care if you or anyone is impressed or not. If you're not impressed by the architecture then you're clearly just as blind as everyone else.
The narratives, and timelines are way off. How they date things to (insert made up time here) is nonsense as well.
This film, ties nicely in with another documentary called "The Lost History of Flat Earth", and answers a lot of questions one would have after watching OWOrder.
(Link to TLHoFE = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ul0e6lw130&list=PLFNdpYb97j6MGVJVq1bkpcwA5CG-Jeh_D&index=52)
But any time we mention FE... that's when people stop listening.
The Lost History of FE is barely even about the shape of the earth, but about things hidden in plain sight, things we see every day... and they didn't even go into what Rocks, mountains, Mesas, etc actually are... however Greg Reese here had on a guy named Stellium7, and he goes deep into that field... what Geology actually is. We're calling it "Biogeology" now, because geology is all biological.
If you don't believe that last part... have a look through Greg's videos. Look for the episode with Stellium7. His real name is Michael Wilkerson.
Here's a link to Greg/Stellium7s interview = https://gregreese.substack.com/p/stellium7?utm_source=publication-search
“The structures and buildings they show cannot be built by anyone today. Architects have no idea how they were built.”
This is flat-out false. Engineers and archaeologists do know how ancient monuments were built. We’ve documented the tools, techniques, labor forces, and construction sequences for the Great Pyramids, Roman aqueducts, Gothic cathedrals, and more.
Example: The Great Pyramid of Giza was built using:
Copper chisels
Lever systems
Limestone blocks
Massive labor forces (not slaves)
Modern reconstructions (e.g., by National Geographic and NOVA) have replicated ancient construction techniques on a smaller scale — successfully.
We can build them — and we have replicated how.
“The buildings have fake made-up historical narratives attached to them... built in a year during the buggy era before power tools.”
The suggestion that cathedrals or pyramids were built in a single year is historically and logistically laughable. Many Gothic cathedrals took decades to centuries to complete — and we have detailed construction records, inscriptions, and documentation to support this.
Your implication that people were “wiping with their hands” and couldn’t build advanced architecture is chronologically ignorant. Human ingenuity didn’t begin with power tools.
You have a basic misunderstanding of historical timelines and documented construction methods.
“The timelines are way off. How they date things is nonsense.”
Dating methods like radiocarbon dating, dendrochronology, thermoluminescence, and stratigraphy are science-based, peer-reviewed, and used across disciplines. These methods consistently correlate with written records, astronomical events, and even volcanic ash layers. “Everything was built more recently” is a claim with zero support from actual archaeologists or historians.
Just because YouTubers doubt dating methods doesn’t mean science is wrong.
“This ties in with The Lost History of Flat Earth. People stop listening when we mention FE...”
Yep. Because Flat Earth is 100% debunked pseudoscience. We have satellite imagery, physics, circumnavigation, photos from the ISS, and even airline flight paths that only work on a globe. The fact that you tie OWO to Flat Earth theory shows just how far from credible this worldview is.
Associating with Flat Earth instantly discredits the rest.
“Geology is fake. It’s actually ‘biogeology’ — rocks are biological.”
“Biogeology” is not a real term. Rocks are not bones, and mountains are not the fossilized corpses of ancient titans. This idea comes from Stellium7 (Michael Wilkerson) — a YouTuber with no geological credentials, who claims rock formations are giant petrified animals. Real geologists can show mineral composition, crystalline structure, and tectonic processes that explain rock formations without invoking fantasy biology.
“Architects have no idea how these things were built.”
This is an insult to the entire field of architectural history and civil engineering.
We have texts like:
Vitruvius’s De Architectura (1st century BCE)
Ancient Egyptian construction records
Medieval cathedral blueprints
Modern architects study these in universities. We know exactly how structures like the Pantheon, Hagia Sophia, and Notre Dame were engineered.
Architects and historians know a lot. YOU just don't read them.
So… you think Stellium7 is just making it all up eh?
Everything you’ve said is again, more nonsense.
So many clowns around here… yea… Peer Review is the best, that is comical.
You’re a fine example of the brainwashed mind.
“So... you think Stellium7 is just making it all up eh?”
Yes. Because he is.
Michael Wilkerson (a.k.a. Stellium7) is a YouTuber with no geological training who believes mountains are petrified organs and rocks are fossilized giants. That’s not science. That’s mythology.
You can’t just throw out everything we know about mineralogy, tectonics, erosion, and crystallization because a guy with zero qualifications found a rock shaped like a kidney and called it a giant’s heart.
“Peer review is comical”? That’s rich.
You just admitted you don’t trust peer review, which is literally the foundation of modern science. You know — the process that:
Filters out false claims,
Forces transparency,
Requires reproducibility,
And separates fact from fantasy.
But sure, some random dude on YouTube with no credentials and a Patreon link? Totally legit.
That’s like saying “doctors are a scam” while trusting your medical advice from a guy who sells crystals on Etsy.
“So many clowns around here…”
You’ve done zero research, ignored every fact I posted, and instead of countering the evidence, you:
Called people clowns, mocked peer review, and repeated the name of your favorite internet guru like it’s gospel. You’re not debating. You’re projecting — because deep down, you know your worldview collapses the second you have to explain it without YouTube videos.
“You’re a fine example of the brainwashed mind.”
That’s the go-to line for every conspiracy theorist when they’re cornered by facts:
No, Brandon — I’m informed.
I read academic journals, not fringe Substacks and echo-chamber Telegram channels.
If you think education = brainwashing and scientific literacy = indoctrination, then you’re not having a conversation — you’re having a cult experience.
Why are there no source links?
Because there is no evidence to support this. Not that I could find, anyway.
Agreed. I couldn't find any.
Eventually someone shared this link (https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/pyramids-of-giza-new-discovery-structures/) with me on X.
I'm not a fan of "fact-checking" sites in general, but as this particular article essentially corroborates all of my own findings (or lack thereof), plus a bit more, it's easier to share this article than to write out all the details of my investigation into this story.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/NuL3Fv-x3so?si=aDUebnQ_yaOJUfu4&start=0&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR3XoJcxrwlNUICWdy8GwU7uxEhrvq6zkZwhDjzNZalQXswv_Z7hmtcg7kY_aem_Se9heCdgk_gr-IE-9cMtBQ
Lol you keep repeating a stupid yt link as your proverbial crutch of truth that's already in itself says it all
https://www.youtube.com/embed/NuL3Fv-x3so?si=aDUebnQ_yaOJUfu4&start=0&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR3XoJcxrwlNUICWdy8GwU7uxEhrvq6zkZwhDjzNZalQXswv_Z7hmtcg7kY_aem_Se9heCdgk_gr-IE-9cMtBQ
Egyptologists are gonna have to come up with another bullshit story to explain all this.
It will start with, "Amateurs!!!"
Wow!!
THEE BEST Education that anyone will get......is via Dr. JPF (Joseph P. Farrell)!!
His books (website)..... https://gizadeathstar.com/purchase/
Greg, this is how we know the Evil are from Orion!
Pyramids are giant telecommunications transmitting and receiving stations, and pyramids all over the world align to...Orion!
The Archons, the evil-ass lowlife, scum-sucking psychopathic space trash that run this prison planet are from Orion!
PS Greg, have you heard they found a pyramid in Antarctica buried under the ice? I bet its aligned to Orion!
PPS. Great vid, thanks for putting it all together so concisely!
👍
It would not surprise me
And Greg, the reason its important to know that the Evil are from Orion is because Orion used to be a violent, patriarchal civilization. Over time the females began having input and influence, and ultimately equal power, and Orion became a PEACEFUL, prosperous civilization. Which was good, except the young sons of the King and Queen were bored.
So when they came to Earth to set up their mining industry they deliberately created their labor force (us) to include the 'reptilian brain', which is violent and aggressive.
That way, the King's sons can play their war games here, and build a massive violent aggressive military and attack anyone who comes near Earth.
And by socially engineering the false patriarchy into OUR population it assures the Evil that the males and females here cannot achieve the balance of strength, and empower the human population, and together create a PEACEFUL Earth, because WARS ARE NECESSARY for culling the males. As any good farmer knows, you can't have too many bulls in the herd!
Hence our Reptilian Brain.
So knowing that the Evil are from Orion explains why we are reincarnationally trapped in a violent, perverted prison farm run by psychopathic SPACE TRASH from Orion!!
I'm telling you Greg, we need to take the White Pill, the once in every 25,000year opportunity to escape, and blow this popsicle stand!
You should start writing science-fiction novels. You are really good at it. This is fucking bonkers!
Wow, so interesting. How can get further information about your comment?. I'd like to know how get the "white pill".
Agree. They at least had the capability to communicate with them.
I'm still watching the clip, but @ 1:50, those pillars they found... I believe them to be coils, just like they are on "old world" buildings (like our White House, and EVERY single Capital Building).
To Per Thomsen - Take a look at a documentary that came out last year called
"Old World Order" made by Hibbeler.
The truth is there.
Yes Brandon! Excellent documentary. Here is the link for anyone interested:
https://rumble.com/v4z1gwe-old-world-order-tartaria-history-everything-weve-been-told-is-a-lie-hibbler.html
Brandon, odd question: Did you reply to my comment and your reply was deleted, or disappeared?
I deleted it, nothing to do with censorship or anything... just not sure how open I should be talking about this idea.
I think there was definitely a wireless energy grid. It was probably used as a direct energy weapon during the reset of the late 1700's, early 1800's. Then they used the World Fairs to destroy most of the evidence of this grid and get us on their wired control grid.
Highest compliment here, but Greg Reese's incredible narration could make a simple trip to the bathroom one of the most astonishing and mysterious things ever discovered. I mean this with deepest respect for Greg's skillset.
Wow, that is amazing! Thanks Greg❤️
Absolutely fascinating.
One thing is for certain: the ancients knew a heck of a lot more than we give them credit for.
The question is...who were they??
Cylinders arranged under ground ?! Didn't that whistle-blower (can't remember his name) say there was the same type of thing at a "research" base in Antarctica?
Satan is the great mimicker of God. Don't forget that he was one of the highest angels in heaven before he challenged God's rule and sought out his throne. Think of all the knowledge he and his followers (1/3 of the heavenly angels) had when they lost that coup attempt and were kicked out of heaven. Jesus said that he saw Satan fall like lightening. Satan, once called Lucifer, ceased to be the light bringer he once was. Jesus called himself "the true light" that came into the world: Satan is the false light. He offered Adam and Eve the opportunity to join him in his world absent and opposite of God. They succumbed, because the picture he painted them were lies and deceptions. It is not surprising that his religion - seen here in this video - is very much like God's. As intelligent as Jordan Maxwell is, I think some of his 'observances' about Jesus and the 12 were pointed out to him by the one who has led him completely astray. Sadly, he got lost in this and I don't expect to see him in heaven. Yes, all this is true in Catholicism, hence the Protestant Reformation where the original early church that grew up into a large following split apart when the corruption in the original church became overwhelmingly great. Protestants do not follow these synchronistic rituals, etc. - except the major Christian holidays are on the dates you pointed out. Pagan religions as shown, had horrible 'worship' identical to Satanism. True Christianity decries all of those things as wicked. While there are some things to be seen as similar or synchronistic, the vast majority of the Bible bears no comparison to paganism, nor does the practice of Christianity or the success of nations built upon Christianity. Hence, the comparison is limited to similar symbols, etc. Sadly, Jordan Maxwell, who had the uncanny ability to see the duplication of word and symbols everywhere, seemed not to be able to see the truth that Satan obscured from him.
Jesus. The Alpha and Omega. A Holy God. King of Kings. He is God. Who is God? He is Jesus. And to Him we have to answer. Why does it make men uncomfortable or angry or dismissive? Because we have to accept we are sinners and lost and in need of a Saviour. God sent His Son to save us. Without Him, we are lost. The Holy Bible gives us all we ever need for answers.
The Hebrew name of the devil is Helel. Lucifer is the Latin name for Helel.
Eve was deceived by the serpent. Adam was not deceived, but partook because they were one flesh, bone of his bone. Adam partook to SAVE EVE and their progeny, which became Israelites.
Jesus was the firstborn of the offspring Begotten in heaven before the foundations of the earth were laid, and under primogeniture, Jesus was the first to visit earth in a physical body AS ADAM. Jesus is The First and Last ADAM!
First and last Adam
1 Corinthians 15:45
“And so it is written, *The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam (Jesus) was made a quickening spirit.*
46 Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual
47 *The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven.*
First and last (Adam)
Revelation 1:11
Saying, *I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last:* and, What thou seest, write in a book, and send it unto the seven churches which are in Asia; unto Ephesus, and unto Smyrna, and unto Pergamos, and unto Thyatira, and unto Sardis, and unto Philadelphia, and unto Laodicea
I agree with most of this. Adam was enticed by the Serpent and Eve. However, Adam was there first for some time before God created Eve out of his rib. Adam was the head of the human race, not Eve. As a result, God clearly laid the burden of the fall of humanity and of the world on Adam. "Through one MAN'S sin, all died". It was through Adam, not Eve, that the fall took place as Adam had headship in the Garden and had the responsibility to watch over Eve, which he did not do. When he saw that Eve was being tempted, he did nothing and nothing to stop her from eating of the fruit. Why? He was standing right there, because after she ate of it, he waited and she offered him some and then he ate. I believe the reason was because he wanted to see if God was telling them the truth. Once he saw that Eve did not die (immediately), he too took the fruit. I often notice that men want to put the blame on Eve for the downfall of the world and also that they want to justify or make an excuse for Adam's sin because of Eve's sin. This is quite sad, because not only is this not true according to to Scripture, but also shows the male ego to justify himself just as Adam did in the garden (Eve gave it to me) rather than to simply be honest and admit to Adam's sin as being the one that started the domino effect. If Adam had, in fact, tried to save Eve, he would have knocked the fruit out of her hand, and taken her away from the serpent, but that is not what was happening. Adam was just as interested in it and failed to act as the head of the family and protect Eve. The idea that they were one flesh does not hold water. Even as 'one flesh' they each had their own choice and chose to sin.
Well we do not know if Adam was right there and saw it all.
But woman is so naturally disobedient if she had not disobeyed God the next woman would have. Woman or man we are all naturally sinful inclined to lawlessness. We all need a Saviour God. What would we do without Him?
Sky, you need to read the Bible! Here is the account from Genesis 2-3
Genesis 2:7Then the LORD God formed man from the dust of the ground and breathed the breath of life into his nostrils, and the man became a living being.
8And the LORD God planted a garden in Eden, in the east, where He placed the man He had formed. 9Out of the ground the LORD God gave growth to every tree that is pleasing to the eye and good for food. And in the middle of the garden were the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
15Then the LORD God took the man and placed him in the Garden of Eden to cultivate and keep it.
16And the LORD God commanded him, “You may eat freely from every tree of the garden, 17but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil; for in the day that you eat of it, you will surely die.”
18The LORD God also said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make for him a suitable helper.”
19And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the air, and He brought them to the man to see what he would name each one. And whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name. 20The man gave names to all the livestock, to the birds of the air, and to every beast of the field. But for Adame no suitable helper was found.
21So the LORD God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep, and while he slept, He took one of the man’s ribsf and closed up the area with flesh. 22And from the rib that the LORD God had taken from the man, He made a woman and brought her to him. 23And the man said:
“This is now bone of my bones
and flesh of my flesh;
she shall be called ‘woman,’
for out of man she was taken.”
24For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh.g
25And the man and his wife were both naked, and they were not ashamed.
This shows that God made Adam first, then created Eve from a rib in his body - from his side, to be next to his side (not from his feet to be under him or from his head, to be over him). There was no mate for Adam (beastiality is wrong).
Now, as you can see Adam was given the command FIRST. He knew the law FIRST. This is what we call 'headship'. He was first in the garden and he represented all of humanity ( since all of humanity would follow from Adam and Eve).
Next:
Genesis, Chapter 3
Berean Standard Bible Par ▾
The Serpent’s Deception
(Romans 5:12–21)
1Now the serpenta was more crafty than any beast of the field that the LORD God had made. And he said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden?’”
2The woman answered the serpent, “We may eat the fruit of the trees of the garden, 3but about the fruit of the tree in the middle of the garden, God has said, ‘You must not eat of it or touch it, or you will die.’”
4“You will not surely die,” the serpent told the woman. 5“For God knows that in the day you eat of it, your eyes will be opened and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”
6When the woman saw that the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eyes, and that it was desirable for obtaining wisdom, she took the fruit and ate it.
Here is where the Bible said Adam was there while all this was happening. Eve was deceived. What did Adam do, since he was the head of the garden) to protect her? Why did he let her get seduced by the serpent? Why didn't he break in and recite God's command and take Eve away or knock the fruit out of her hand?
She also gave some to her husband who was with her, and he ate it.
7And the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked; so they sewed together fig leaves and made coverings for themselves.
So, they both sinned, but God holds Adam, not Eve for the downfall, because Adam was the head, the leader. Berean Standard Bible Par ▾
The Serpent’s Deception
(Romans 5:12–21)
1Now the serpenta was more crafty than any beast of the field that the LORD God had made. And he said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden?’”
2The woman answered the serpent, “We may eat the fruit of the trees of the garden, 3but about the fruit of the tree in the middle of the garden, God has said, ‘You must not eat of it or touch it, or you will die.’”
4“You will not surely die,” the serpent told the woman. 5“For God knows that in the day you eat of it, your eyes will be opened and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”
6When the woman saw that the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eyes, and that it was desirable for obtaining wisdom, she took the fruit and ate it. She also gave some to her husband who was with her, and he ate it.
7And the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked; so they sewed together fig leaves and made coverings for themselves.
God holds Adam ,not Eve responsible.
Romans 5: 12 Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned— Through a man (Adam), not Eve.
Another translation is more pointed:
"When Adam sinned, sin entered the world. Adam’s sin brought death, so death spread to everyone, for everyone sinned."
Eve did not disobey Adam...he never gave her a loving and saving directive "No Eve! that will kill us, let's get out of here!". So, in my book Adam sinned first because of dereliction of duty. It was his duty to protect Eve and he didn't and as a result, sin, which brought death, brought death to the entire world....but, Jesus has reversed all that for those who believe in him.
😊 Read it many times. Since a child to old age. And to my children. And had wonderful Godly teachers. Yes Adam is most responsible and responsible to guide and protect her. I understand your point. Yet Eve can't blame him, cant shift the blame so to speak. She is also responsible to God and to obey Him. Directly accountable to God. As are all women. And are all men.
Yes, we are all guilty before God - and can't earn anything since anything that comes out of us is tainted by our innate sin. So thankful that Jesus died for what WE've done so we could be in his arms again! Have a blessed Sunday.
Sorry but that is confusion.Adam was made. Created by God. A man.
JESUS was and is and will always be God. A HOLY God. He was never Adam.
God sent Him to earth once as a Holy Babe. And He died for us. To save us from our sins. If we repent. And He was raised again. And went back to Heaven. God the Father. God the Son and God the Holy Spirit. The Triune God
So, Sky - you do know about Salvation and that is wonderful, but you have more studying to do :)
I believe there is a pyramid in Bolivia that predates those in Egypt. https://rumble.com/v3liilo-the-primordial-code-documentary.html
Also perhaps the Anlong China "pyramids" that are being classified as "Natural Geological Formations" ...lol
Luckily, this article is from an open-source journal, so it's easily verified that, no, in fact, nothing of the kind was found by Malanga & Biondi. Hope this helps.
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/20/5231
Different pyramid, this was their old research of the Khnum-Khufu Pyramid, the video refers to a recent press release from 15.03.2025. I guess if the claims are true they haven't released that study yet.